N2E: A General Framework to Reduce Node-Differential Privacy to Edge-Differential Privacy for Graph Analytics
Yihua Hu, Hao Ding, Wei Dong
Abstract
Differential privacy (DP) has been widely adopted to protect sensitive information in graph analytics. While edge-DP, which protects privacy at the edge level, has been extensively studied, node-DP, offering stronger protection for entire nodes and their incident edges, remains largely underexplored due to its technical challenges. A natural way to bridge this gap is to develop a general framework for reducing node-DP graph analytical tasks to edge-DP ones, enabling the reuse of existing edge-DP mechanisms. A straightforward solution based on group privacy divides the privacy budget by a given degree upper bound, but this leads to poor utility when the bound is set conservatively large to accommodate worst-case inputs. To address this, we propose node-to-edge (N2E), a general framework that reduces any node-DP graph analytical task to an edge-DP one, with the error dependency on the graph's true maximum degree. N2E introduces two novel techniques: a distance-preserving clipping mechanism that bounds edge distance between neighboring graphs after clipping, and the first node-DP mechanism for maximum degree approximation, enabling tight, privacy-preserving clipping thresholds. By instantiating N2E with existing edge-DP mechanisms, we obtain the first node-DP solutions for tasks such as maximum degree estimation. For edge counting, our method theoretically matches the error of the state-of-the-art, which is provably optimal, and significantly outperforms existing approaches for degree distribution estimation. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework achieves up to a 2.5x reduction in error for edge counting and up to an 80x reduction for degree distribution estimation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fc55e200-2030-4460-a3c6-a2e339ac45a1Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- Locally Differentially Private Analysis of Graph StatisticsJacob Imola, Takao Murakami, Kamalika ChaudhuriUSENIX Security 2021 · 139 citations
- Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential PrivacyZiyue Huang, Yuting Liang, Ke YiNeurIPS 2021 · 74 citations
- R2T: Instance-optimal Truncation for Differentially Private Query Evaluation with Foreign KeysWei Dong, Juanru Fang, Ke Yi, Yuchao Tao et al.SIGMOD 2022 · 41 citations
- Residual Sensitivity for Differentially Private Multi-Way JoinsWei Dong, Ke YiSIGMOD 2021 · 32 citations
- Differentially Private Densest Subgraph DetectionDung Nguyen, Anil VullikantiICML 2021 · 26 citations
Related papers
- SaGD: A Node-Level Differentially Private Graph Learning Framework with Sensitivity-Aware Gradient DescentJianxin Wei, Ergute Bao, Xiaokui Xiao, Ting YuWWW 2026
- Collecting Triangle Counts with Edge Relationship Local Differential PrivacyYuhan Liu, Suyun Zhao, Yixuan Liu, Dan Zhao et al.ICDE 2022 · 28 citations
- Common Neighborhood Estimation over Bipartite Graphs under Local Differential PrivacyYizhang He, Kai Wang, Wenjie Zhang, Xuemin Lin et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 7 citations
- Robust Privacy-Preserving Triangle Counting under Edge Local Differential PrivacyYizhang He, Kai Wang, Wenjie Zhang, Xuemin Lin et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 5 citations
- Global and Local Differentially Private Release of Count-Weighted GraphsFelipe T. Brito, Victor A. E. de Farias, Cheryl J. Flynn, Subhabrata Majumdar et al.SIGMOD 2023 · 12 citations
