Recursive Introspection: Teaching Language Model Agents How to Self-Improve
Yuxiao Qu, Tianjun Zhang, Naman Garg, Aviral Kumar
Abstract
A central piece in enabling intelligent agentic behavior in foundation models is to make them capable of introspecting upon their behavior, reasoning, and correcting their mistakes as more computation or interaction is available. Even the strongest proprietary large language models (LLMs) do not quite exhibit the ability of continually improving their responses sequentially, even in scenarios where they are explicitly told that they are making a mistake. In this paper, we develop RISE: Recursive IntroSpEction, an approach for fine-tuning LLMs to introduce this capability, despite prior work hypothesizing that this capability may not be possible to attain. Our approach prescribes an iterative fine-tuning procedure, which attempts to teach the model how to alter its response after having executed previously unsuccessful attempts to solve a hard test-time problem, with optionally additional environment feedback. RISE poses fine-tuning for a single-turn prompt as solving a multi-turn Markov decision process (MDP), where the initial state is the prompt. Inspired by principles in online imitation learning and reinforcement learning, we propose strategies for multi-turn data collection and training so as to imbue an LLM with the capability to recursively detect and correct its previous mistakes in subsequent iterations. Our experiments show that RISE enables Llama2, Llama3, and Mistral models to improve themselves with more turns on math reasoning tasks, outperforming several single-turn strategies given an equal amount of inference-time computation. We also find that RISE scales well, often attaining larger benefits with more capable models. Our analysis shows that RISE makes meaningful improvements to responses to arrive at the correct solution for challenging prompts, without disrupting one-turn abilities as a result of expressing more complex distributions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fc5007f0-0cd1-4863-ade5-9df781d1bbe6Cited by top-tier papers67
- The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM ReasoningShivam Agarwal, Zimin Zhang, Lifan Yuan, Jiawei Han et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 185 citations
- e3: Learning to Explore Enables Extrapolation of Test-Time Compute for LLMsAmrith Setlur, Matthew Y. R. Yang, Charlie Victor Snell, Jeremiah Greer et al.ICLR 2026 · 66 citations
- MAPoRL: Multi-Agent Post-Co-Training for Collaborative Large Language Models with Reinforcement LearningChanwoo Park, Seungju Han, Xingzhi Guo, Asuman E. Ozdaglar et al.ACL 2025 · 63 citations
- Causal Prompting: Debiasing Large Language Model Prompting Based on Front-Door AdjustmentCongzhi Zhang, Linhai Zhang, Jialong Wu, Yulan He et al.AAAI 2025 · 42 citations
- Thinking vs. Doing: Improving Agent Reasoning by Scaling Test-Time InteractionJunhong Shen, Hao Bai, Lunjun Zhang, Yifei Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 34 citations
Builds on28
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent DebateYilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICML 2024 · 1,562 citations
- Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied AgentsWenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, Igor MordatchICML 2022 · 1,539 citations
- STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With ReasoningEric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,126 citations
Related papers
- Trust, But Verify: A Self-Verification Approach to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable RewardsXiaoyuan Liu, Tian Liang, Zhiwei He, Jiahao Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 46 citations
- S^3cMath: Spontaneous Step-Level Self-Correction Makes Large Language Models Better Mathematical ReasonersYuchen Yan, Jin Jiang, Yang Liu, Yixin Cao et al.AAAI 2025 · 19 citations
- Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Vincent Zhuang, Rishabh Agarwal, Yi Su et al.ICLR 2025
- ReActR: Reasoning through Error-Activated Reflection for LLM Post-TrainingLina SunACL 2026
- MathSE: Improving Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning via Self-Evolving Iterative Reflection and Reward-Guided Fine-TuningJinhao Chen, Zhen Yang, Jianxin Shi, Tianyu Wo et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
