Personalized Ranking with Importance Sampling
Defu Lian, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen
Abstract
As the task of predicting a personalized ranking on a set of items, item recommendation has become an important way to address information overload. Optimizing ranking loss aligns better with the ultimate goal of item recommendation, so many ranking-based methods were proposed for item recommendation, such as collaborative filtering with Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR) loss, and Weighted Approximate-Rank Pairwise (WARP) loss. However, the ranking-based methods can not consistently beat regression-based models with the gravity regularizer. The key challenge in rankingbased optimization is difficult to fully use the limited number of negative samples, particularly when they are not so informative. To this end, we propose a new ranking loss based on importance sampling so that more informative negative samples can be better used. We then design a series of negative samplers from simple to complex, whose informativeness of negative samples is from less to more. With these samplers, the loss function is easy to use and can be optimized by popular solvers. The proposed algorithms are evaluated with five real-world datasets of varying size and difficulty. The results show that they consistently outperform the state-of-the-art item recommendation algorithms, and the relative improvements with respect to NDCG@50 are more than 19.2% on average. Moreover, the loss function is verified to make better use of negative samples and to require fewer negative samples when they are more informative. CCS CONCEPTS • Information systems → Collaborative filtering.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fc461ce6-c2bd-49d0-bd06-13d247ffdd9eCited by top-tier papers27
- Geography-Aware Sequential Location RecommendationDefu Lian, Yongji Wu, Yong Ge, Xing Xie et al.KDD 2020 · 244 citations
- HRCF: Enhancing Collaborative Filtering via Hyperbolic Geometric RegularizationMenglin Yang, Min Zhou, Jiahong Liu, Defu Lian et al.WWW 2022 · 110 citations
- Incorporating Bias-aware Margins into Contrastive Loss for Collaborative FilteringAn Zhang, Wenchang Ma, Xiang Wang, Tat-Seng ChuaNeurIPS 2022 · 79 citations
- On the Theories Behind Hard Negative Sampling for RecommendationWentao Shi, Jiawei Chen, Fuli Feng, Jizhi Zhang et al.WWW 2023 · 66 citations
- Empowering Collaborative Filtering with Principled Adversarial Contrastive LossAn Zhang, Leheng Sheng, Zhibo Cai, Xiang Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 56 citations
Related papers
- Learning-Efficient Yet Generalizable Collaborative Filtering for Item RecommendationYuanhao Pu, Xiaolong Chen, Xu Huang, Jin Chen et al.ICML 2024 · 8 citations
- MCL: Mixed-Centric Loss for Collaborative FilteringZhaolin Gao, Zhaoyue Cheng, Felipe Pérez, Jianing Sun et al.WWW 2022 · 10 citations
- StabCF: A Stabilized Training Method for Collaborative FilteringXi Wu, Wenzhe Zhang, Liangwei Yang, Yi Zhao et al.KDD 2026
- Learning Recommenders for Implicit Feedback with Importance ResamplingJin Chen, Defu Lian, Binbin Jin, Kai Zheng et al.WWW 2022 · 39 citations
- Understanding and Scaling Collaborative Filtering Optimization from the Perspective of Matrix RankDonald Loveland, Xinyi Wu, Tong Zhao, Danai Koutra et al.WWW 2025 · 9 citations
