Auditing Fairness by Betting
Ben Chugg, Santiago Cortes-Gomez, Bryan Wilder, Aaditya Ramdas
Abstract
We provide practical, efficient, and nonparametric methods for auditing the fairness of deployed classification and regression models. Whereas previous work relies on a fixedsample size, our methods are sequential and allow for the continuous monitoring of incoming data, making them highly amenable to tracking the fairness of real-world systems. We also allow the data to be collected by a probabilistic policy as opposed to sampled uniformly from the population. This enables auditing to be conducted on data gathered for another purpose. Moreover, this policy may change over time and different policies may be used on different subpopulations. Finally, our methods can handle distribution shift resulting from either changes to the model or changes in the underlying population. Our approach is based on recent progress in anytime-valid inference and game-theoretic statistics-the "testing by betting" framework in particular. These connections ensure that our methods are interpretable, fast, and easy to implement. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on three benchmark fairness datasets. Contents
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fc2cf592-2d3a-4293-9ee3-eeede03c6998Cited by top-tier papers8
- PROSAC: Provably Safe Certification for Machine Learning Models under Adversarial AttacksChen Feng, Ziquan Liu, Zhuo Zhi, Ilija Bogunovic et al.AAAI 2025 · 15 citations
- Sequentially Auditing Differential PrivacyTomás González Lara, Mateo Dulce-Rubio, Aaditya Ramdas, Mónica RiberoNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Anytime Detection of Strategic Deviations in Multi-Agent SystemsEtienne Gauthier, Francis Bach, Michael JordanICML 2026 · 2 citations
- GAAVI: Global Asymptotic Anytime Valid Inference for the Conditional Mean FunctionBrian Cho, Raaz Dwivedi, Nathan KallusICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Testing For Distribution Shifts with Conditional Conformal Test MartingalesShalev Shaer, Yarin Bar, Drew Prinster, Yaniv RomanoICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on5
- Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningFrances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2021 · 671 citations
- Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm AuditsJack BandyCSCW 2021 · 190 citations
- Testing Group Fairness via Optimal Transport ProjectionsNian Si, Karthyek Murthy, Jose H. Blanchet, Viet Anh NguyenICML 2021 · 37 citations
- Better Parameter-Free Stochastic Optimization with ODE Updates for Coin-BettingKeyi Chen, John Langford, Francesco OrabonaAAAI 2022 · 23 citations
- Integrating Reward Maximization and Population Estimation: Sequential Decision-Making for Internal Revenue Service Audit SelectionPeter Henderson, Ben Chugg, Brandon R. Anderson, Kristen M. Altenburger et al.AAAI 2023 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Semi-Supervised Hypothesis Testing by Betting on PredictionsYaniv Tenzer, Elad Tolochinksy, Yaniv RomanoICML 2026
- Online Fairness Auditing through Iterative RefinementPranav Maneriker, Codi Burley, Srinivasan ParthasarathyKDD 2023 · 6 citations
- Tracking the risk of a deployed model and detecting harmful distribution shiftsAleksandr Podkopaev, Aaditya RamdasICLR 2022 · 36 citations
- Monitoring Algorithmic FairnessThomas A. Henzinger, Mahyar Karimi, Konstantin Kueffner, Kaushik MallikCAV 2023 · 13 citations
- Evaluating Fairness Using Permutation TestsCyrus DiCiccio, Sriram Vasudevan, Kinjal Basu, Krishnaram Kenthapadi et al.KDD 2020 · 2 citations
