DP-NCB: Privacy Preserving Fair Bandits
Dhruv Sarkar, Nishant Pandey, Sayak Ray Chowdhury
Abstract
Multi-armed bandit algorithms are fundamental tools for sequential decision-making under uncertainty, with widespread applications across domains such as clinical trials and personalized decision-making. As bandit algorithms are increasingly deployed in these socially sensitive settings, it becomes critical to protect user data privacy and ensure fair treatment across decision rounds. While prior work has independently addressed privacy and fairness in bandit settings, the question of whether both objectives can be achieved simultaneously has remained largely open. Existing privacy-preserving bandit algorithms typically optimize average regret, a utilitarian measure, whereas fairness-aware approaches focus on minimizing Nash regret, which penalizes inequitable reward distributions, but often disregard privacy concerns.
To bridge this gap, we introduce Differentially Private Nash Confidence Bound (DP-NCB)—a novel and unified algorithmic framework that simultaneously ensures ϵ-differential privacy and achieves order-optimal Nash regret, matching known lower bounds up to logarithmic factors. The framework is sufficiently general to operate under both global and local differential privacy models, and is anytime, requiring no prior knowledge of the time horizon. We support our theoretical guarantees with simulations on synthetic bandit instances, showing that DP-NCB incurs substantially lower Nash regret than state-of-the-art baselines. Our results offer a principled foundation for designing bandit algorithms that are both privacy-preserving and fair, making them suitable for high-stakes, socially impactful applications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fbf8bd17-d08a-4490-b283-bdcfc4687371Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Differentially Private Multi-Armed Bandits in the Shuffle ModelJay Tenenbaum, Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, Uri StemmerNeurIPS 2021 · 37 citations
- When Privacy Meets Partial Information: A Refined Analysis of Differentially Private BanditsAchraf Azize, Debabrota BasuNeurIPS 2022 · 34 citations
- Fairness and Welfare Quantification for Regret in Multi-Armed BanditsSiddharth Barman, Arindam Khan, Arnab Maiti, Ayush SawarniAAAI 2023 · 18 citations
- Nash Regret Guarantees for Linear BanditsAyush Sawarni, Soumyabrata Pal, Siddharth BarmanNeurIPS 2023 · 12 citations
- p-Mean Regret for Stochastic BanditsAnand Krishna, Philips George John, Adarsh Barik, Vincent Y. F. TanAAAI 2025 · 5 citations
Related papers
- (Locally) Differentially Private Combinatorial Semi-BanditsXiaoyu Chen, Kai Zheng, Zixin Zhou, Yunchang Yang et al.ICML 2020 · 24 citations
- Federated Linear Contextual Bandits with User-level Differential PrivacyRuiquan Huang, Huanyu Zhang, Luca Melis, Milan Shen et al.ICML 2023 · 17 citations
- Optimal Regret of Bandits under Differential PrivacyAchraf Azize, Yulian Wu, Junya Honda, Francesco Orabona et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Connecting Thompson Sampling and UCB: Towards More Efficient Trade-offs Between Privacy and RegretBingshan Hu, Zhiming Huang, Tianyue H. Zhang, Mathias Lécuyer et al.ICML 2025
- Shuffle Private Linear Contextual BanditsSayak Ray Chowdhury, Xingyu ZhouICML 2022 · 29 citations
