Can Machines Understand Composition? Dataset and Benchmark for Photographic Image Composition Embedding and Understanding
Zhaoran Zhao, Peng Lu, Anran Zhang, Peipei Li, Xia Li, Xuannan Liu, Yang Hu, Shiyi Chen, Liwei Wang, Wenhao Guo
Abstract
With the rapid growth of social media and digital photography, visually appealing images have become essential for effective communication and emotional engagement. Among the factors influencing aesthetic appeal, composition-the arrangement of visual elements within a frame-plays a crucial role. In recent years, specialized models for photographic composition have achieved impressive results across various aesthetic tasks. Meanwhile, rapidly advancing multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have excelled in several visual perception tasks. However, their ability to embed and understand compositional information remains underexplored, primarily due to the lack of suitable evaluation datasets. To address this gap, we introduce the Photographic Image Composition Dataset (PICD), a large-scale dataset consisting of 36,857 images categorized into 24 composition categories across 355 diverse scenes. We demonstrate the advantages of PICD over existing datasets in terms of data scale, composition category, label quality, and scene diversity. Building on PICD, we establish benchmarks to evaluate the composition embedding capabilities of specialized models and the compositional understanding ability of MLLMs. To enable efficient and effective evaluation, we propose a novel Composition Discrimination Accuracy (CDA) metric. Our evaluation highlights the limitations of current models and provides insights into directions for improving their ability to embed and understand composition.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fba4056f-df45-4ec6-9322-6550279a91d9Cited by top-tier papers3
- PhotoFramer: Multi-modal Image Composition InstructionZhiyuan You, Ke Wang, He Zhang, Xin Cai et al.CVPR 2026 · 8 citations
- Venus: Benchmarking and Empowering Multimodal Large Language Models for Aesthetic Guidance and CroppingTianxiang Du, Hulingxiao He, Yuxin PengCVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- JoPPO: Hierarchical Photography Assessment via Contrastive Joint Conditional Probabilistic Reinforcement LearningYifan Yang, Juntuo Wang, Yuming Qiao, Xudong Zhang et al.CVPR 2026
Builds on14
- MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality TransformerJunjie Ke, Qifei Wang, Yilin Wang, Peyman Milanfar et al.ICCV 2021 · 1,325 citations
- MMMU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIXiang Yue, Yuansheng Ni, Tianyu Zheng, Kai Zhang et al.CVPR 2024 · 213 citations
- Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment with Rich AttributesYuzhe Yang, Liwu Xu, Leida Li, Nan Qie et al.CVPR 2022 · 84 citations
- Learning Attribute-driven Disentangled Representations for Interactive Fashion RetrievalYuxin Hou, Eleonora Vig, Michael Donoser, Loris BazzaniICCV 2021 · 58 citations
- Image Cropping with Composition and Saliency Aware Aesthetic Score MapYi Tu, Li Niu, Weijie Zhao, Dawei Cheng et al.AAAI 2020 · 55 citations
Related papers
- VidComposition: Can MLLMs Analyze Compositions in Compiled Videos?Yunlong Tang, Junjia Guo, Hang Hua, Susan Liang et al.CVPR 2025
- ArtiMuse: Fine-Grained Image Aesthetics Assessment with Joint Scoring and Expert-Level UnderstandingShuo Cao, Nan Ma, Jiayang Li, Xiaohui Li et al.CVPR 2026 · 38 citations
- InstructCrop: Teaching Multimodal Large Language Models to Crop Aesthetic ImagesXiangfei Sheng, Pangu Xie, Weidong Zou, Pengfei Chen et al.ACM MM 2025
- AffectGPT: A New Dataset, Model, and Benchmark for Emotion Understanding with Multimodal Large Language ModelsZheng Lian, Haoyu Chen, Lan Chen, Haiyang Sun et al.ICML 2025
- AesExpert: Towards Multi-modality Foundation Model for Image Aesthetics PerceptionYipo Huang, Xiangfei Sheng, Zhichao Yang, Quan Yuan et al.ACM MM 2024 · 34 citations
