From Directions to Regions: Decomposing Activations in Language Models via Local Geometry
Or Shafran, Shaked Ronen, Omri Fahn, Shauli Ravfogel, Atticus Geiger, Mor Geva
Abstract
Activation decomposition methods in language models are tightly coupled to geometric assumptions on how concepts are realized in activation space. Existing approaches search for individual global directions, implicitly assuming linear separability, which overlooks concepts with nonlinear or multi-dimensional structure. In this work, we leverage Mixture of Factor Analyzers (MFA) as a scalable, unsupervised alternative that models the activation space as a collection of Gaussian regions with their local covariance structure. MFA decomposes activations into two compositional geometric objects: the region's centroid in activation space, and the local variation from the centroid. We train large-scale MFAs for Llama-3.1-8B and Gemma-2-2B, and show they capture complex, nonlinear structures in activation space. Moreover, evaluations on localization and steering benchmarks show that MFA outperforms unsupervised baselines, is competitive with supervised localization methods, and often achieves stronger steering performance than sparse autoencoders. Together, our findings position local geometry, expressed through subspaces, as a promising unit of analysis for scalable concept discovery and model control, accounting for complex structures that isolated directions fail to capture.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fb6c350b-e88e-47ea-af52-85cb905350a3Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on21
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
- A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse AutoencodersDavid Chanin, James Wilken-Smith, Tomás Dulka, Hardik Bhatnagar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 168 citations
- Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept GeometrySai Sumedh R. Hindupur, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Thomas Fel, Demba BaNeurIPS 2025 · 65 citations
- Isotropy in the Contextual Embedding Space: Clusters and ManifoldsXingyu Cai, Jiaji Huang, Yuchen Bian, Kenneth ChurchICLR 2021 · 50 citations
Related papers
- Constructing Interpretable Features from Compositional Neuron GroupsOr David Shafran, Atticus Geiger, Mor GevaACL 2026 · 4 citations
- Endogenous Resistance to Activation Steering in Language ModelsAlex McKenzie, Keenan Pepper, Stijn Servaes, Martin Leitgab et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Truth is Universal: Robust Detection of Lies in LLMsLennart Bürger, Fred A. Hamprecht, Boaz NadlerNeurIPS 2024 · 93 citations
- Inference-Time Decomposition of Activations (ITDA): A Scalable Approach to Interpreting Large Language ModelsPatrick Leask, Neel Nanda, Noura Al MoubayedICML 2025
- ESPACE: Dimensionality Reduction of Activations for Model CompressionCharbel Sakr, Brucek KhailanyNeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
