FedGCR: Achieving Performance and Fairness for Federated Learning with Distinct Client Types via Group Customization and Reweighting
Shu-Ling Cheng, Chin-Yuan Yeh, Ting-An Chen, Eliana Pastor, Ming-Syan Chen
Abstract
To achieve better performance and greater fairness in Federated Learning (FL), much of the existing research has centered on individual clients, using domain adaptation techniques and redesigned aggregation schemes to counteract client data heterogeneity. However, an overlooked scenario exists where clients belong to distinctive groups, or, client types, in which groups of clients share similar characteristics such as device specifications or data patterns. Despite being common in group collaborations, this scenario has been overlooked in previous research, potentially leading to performance degradation and systemic biases against certain client types. To bridge this gap, we introduce Federated learning with Group Customization and Reweighting (FedGCR). FedGCR enhances both performance and fairness for FL with Distinct Client Types, consisting of a Federated Group Customization (FedGC) model to provide customization via a novel prompt tuning technique to mitigate the data disparity across different client-types, and a Federated Group Reweighting (FedGR) aggregation scheme to ensure uniform and unbiased performances between clients and between client types by a novel reweighting approach. Extensive experiment comparisons with prior FL methods in domain adaptation and fairness demonstrate the superiority of FedGCR in all metrics, including the overall accuracy and performance uniformity in both the group and the individual level. FedGCR achieves 82.74% accuracy and 12.26(↓) in performance uniformity on the Digit-Five dataset and 81.88% and 14.88%(↓) on Domain-Net with a domain imbalance factor of 10, which significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art. Code is available at https://github.com/celinezheng/fedgcr.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated LearningAvishek Ghosh, Jichan Chung, Dong Yin, Kannan RamchandranNeurIPS 2020 · 1,329 citations
- FedBN: Federated Learning on Non-IID Features via Local Batch NormalizationXiaoxiao Li, Meirui Jiang, Xiaofei Zhang, Michael Kamp et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,166 citations
- Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental StudyQinbin Li, Yiqun Diao, Quan Chen, Bingsheng HeICDE 2022 · 1,110 citations
Related papers
- Fair Federated Learning Under Domain Skew with Local Consistency and Domain DiversityYuhang Chen, Wenke Huang, Mang YeCVPR 2024
- Intra-Class Unbiased Prototype Aggregation and Classifier Collaboration for Personalized Federated LearningHao Zheng, Shiyu Song, Zhigang Hu, Meiguang Zheng et al.AAAI 2026
- FedDisco: Federated Learning with Discrepancy-Aware CollaborationRui Ye, Mingkai Xu, Jianyu Wang, Chenxin Xu et al.ICML 2023 · 136 citations
- Tackling Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning with Class PrototypesYutong Dai, Zeyuan Chen, Junnan Li, Shelby Heinecke et al.AAAI 2023 · 154 citations
- Interaction-Aware Gaussian Weighting for Clustered Federated LearningAlessandro Licciardi, Davide Leo, Eros Fanì, Barbara Caputo et al.ICML 2025
