Hash First, Argue Later: Adaptive Verifiable Computations on Outsourced Data
Dario Fiore, Cédric Fournet, Esha Ghosh, Markulf Kohlweiss, Olga Ohrimenko, Bryan Parno
Abstract
Proof systems for verifiable computation (VC) have the potential to make cloud outsourcing more trustworthy. Recent schemes enable a verifier with limited resources to delegate large computations and verify their outcome based on succinct arguments: verification complexity is linear in the size of the inputs and outputs (not the size of the computation). However, cloud computing also often involves large amounts of data, which may exceed the local storage and I/O capabilities of the verifier, and thus limit the use of VC. In this paper, we investigate multi-relation hash & prove schemes for verifiable computations that operate on succinct data hashes. Hence, the verifier delegates both storage and computation to an untrusted worker. She uploads data and keeps hashes; exchanges hashes with other parties; verifies arguments that consume and produce hashes; and selectively downloads the actual data she needs to access. Existing instantiations that fit our definition either target restricted classes of computations or employ relatively inefficient techniques. Instead, we propose efficient constructions that lift classes of existing arguments schemes for fixed relations to multi-relation hash & prove schemes. Our schemes (1) rely on hash algorithms that run linearly in the size of the input; (2) enable constant-time verification of arguments on hashed inputs; (3) incur minimal overhead for the prover. Their main benefit is to amortize the linear cost for the verifier across all relations with shared I/O. Concretely, compared to solutions that can be obtained from prior work, our new hash & prove constructions yield a 1,400x speedup for provers. We also explain how to further reduce the linear verification costs by partially outsourcing the hash computation itself, obtaining a 480x speed-up when applied to existing VC schemes, even on single-relation executions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers19
- Doubly-Efficient zkSNARKs Without Trusted SetupRiad S. Wahby, Ioanna Tzialla, Abhi Shelat, Justin Thaler et al.S&P 2018 · 356 citations
- vSQL: Verifying Arbitrary SQL Queries over Dynamic Outsourced DatabasesYupeng Zhang, Daniel Genkin, Jonathan Katz, Dimitrios Papadopoulos et al.S&P 2017 · 206 citations
- Transparent Polynomial Delegation and Its Applications to Zero Knowledge ProofJiaheng Zhang, Tiancheng Xie, Yupeng Zhang, Dawn SongS&P 2020 · 192 citations
- Betrayal, Distrust, and Rationality: Smart Counter-Collusion Contracts for Verifiable Cloud ComputingChangyu Dong, Yilei Wang, Amjad Aldweesh, Patrick McCorry et al.CCS 2017 · 169 citations
- Mystique: Efficient Conversions for Zero-Knowledge Proofs with Applications to Machine LearningChenkai Weng, Kang Yang, Xiang Xie, Jonathan Katz et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 161 citations
Related papers
- Proving as fast as computing: succinct arguments with constant prover overheadNoga Ron-Zewi, Ron D. RothblumSTOC 2022 · 23 citations
- Hekaton: Horizontally-Scalable zkSNARKs Via Proof AggregationMichael Rosenberg, Tushar Mopuri, Hossein Hafezi, Ian Miers et al.CCS 2024 · 7 citations
- Ligero: Lightweight Sublinear Arguments Without a Trusted SetupScott Ames, Carmit Hazay, Yuval Ishai, Muthuramakrishnan VenkitasubramaniamCCS 2017 · 338 citations
- Multi-Server Verifiable Computation of Low-Degree PolynomialsLiang Feng Zhang, Huaxiong WangS&P 2022 · 23 citations
- Eos: Efficient Private Delegation of zkSNARK ProversAlessandro Chiesa, Ryan Lehmkuhl, Pratyush Mishra, Yinuo ZhangUSENIX Security 2023
