MCTS-SQL: Light-Weight LLMs Can Master the Text-to-SQL Through Monte Carlo Tree Search
Shuozhi Yuan, Liming Chen, Miaomiao Yuan, Jin Zhao
Abstract
Text-to-SQL is a fundamental yet challenging task in the NLP area, aiming at translating natural language questions into SQL queries. While recent advances in large language models have greatly improved performance, most existing approaches depend on models with tens of billions of parameters or costly APIs, limiting their applicability in resource-constrained environments. For real world, especially on edge devices, it is crucial for Text-to-SQL to ensure cost-effectiveness. Therefore, enabling the light-weight models for Text-to-SQL is of great practical significance. However, smaller LLMs often struggle with complicated user instruction, redundant schema linking or syntax correctness. To address these challenges, we propose MCTS-SQL, a novel framework that uses Monte Carlo Tree Search to guide SQL generation through multi-step refinement. Since the light-weight models' weak performance of single-shot prediction, we generate better results through several trials with feedback. However, directly applying MCTS-based methods inevitably leads to significant time and computational overhead. Driven by this issue, we propose a token-level prefix-cache mechanism that stores prior information during iterations, effectively improved the execution speed. Experiments results on the SPIDER and BIRD benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Using a small open-source Qwen2.5-Coder-1.5B, our method outperforms ChatGPT-3.5. When leveraging a more powerful model Gemini 2.5 to explore the performance upper bound, we achieved results competitive with the SOTA. Our findings demonstrate that even small models can be effectively deployed in practical Text-to-SQL systems with the right strategy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fae1940a-498e-4764-9aab-699d87fabea5Cited by top-tier papers2
- LEAF-SQL: Level-Wise Exploration with Adaptive Fine-Graining for Text-to-SQL Skeleton PredictionZhao Tan, Xiping Liu, Qing Shu, Qizhi Wan et al.ICDE 2026
- Addressing Semantic Blind Spots in Text-to-SQL via Component Pre-generation and AST Matching RewardsXingyu Ma, Xin Tian, Lingxiang Wu, Xuepeng Wang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on6
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark EvaluationDawei Gao, Haibin Wang, Yaliang Li, Xiuyu Sun et al.VLDB 2024 · 609 citations
- AlphaMath Almost Zero: Process Supervision without ProcessGuoxin Chen, Minpeng Liao, Chengxi Li, Kai FanNeurIPS 2024 · 219 citations
- Semantic Evaluation for Text-to-SQL with Distilled Test SuitesRuiqi Zhong, Tao Yu, Dan KleinEMNLP 2020 · 88 citations
- Alpha-SQL: Zero-Shot Text-to-SQL using Monte Carlo Tree SearchBoyan Li, Jiayi Zhang, Ju Fan, Yanwei Xu et al.ICML 2025
Related papers
- CodeS: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Text-to-SQLHaoyang Li, Jing Zhang, Hanbing Liu, Ju Fan et al.SIGMOD 2024 · 124 citations
- MARS-SQL: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework For Text-To-SQLHaolin Yang, Jipeng Zhang, Zhitao He, Alexander Zhou et al.ICML 2026 · 12 citations
- OmniSQL: Synthesizing High-quality Text-to-SQL Data at ScaleHaoyang Li, Shang Wu, Xiaokang Zhang, Xinmei Huang et al.VLDB 2025 · 90 citations
- APEX-SQL: Talking to the data via Agentic Exploration for Text-to-SQLBowen Cao, Weibin Liao, Yushi Sun, Dong Fang et al.KDD 2026 · 7 citations
- DCG-SQL: Enhancing In-Context Learning for Text-to-SQL with Deep Contextual Schema Link GraphJihyung Lee, Jin-Seop Lee, Jaehoon Lee, YunSeok Choi et al.ACL 2025
