A Symbolic Analysis of Privacy for TLS 1.3 with Encrypted Client Hello
Karthikeyan Bhargavan, Vincent Cheval, Christopher A. Wood
Abstract
TLS 1.3, the newest version of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol, provides strong authentication and confidentiality guarantees that have been comprehensively analyzed in a variety of formal models. However, despite its controversial use of handshake meta-data encryption, the privacy guarantees of TLS 1.3 remain weak and poorly understood. For example, the protocol reveals the identity of the target server to network attackers, allowing the passive surveillance and active censorship of TLS connections. To close this gap, the IETF TLS working group is standardizing a new privacy extension called Encrypted Client Hello (ECH, previously called ESNI), but the absence of a formal privacy model makes it hard to verify that this extension works. Indeed, several early drafts of ECH were found to be vulnerable to active network attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- DY Fuzzing: Formal Dolev-Yao Models Meet Cryptographic Protocol Fuzz TestingMax Ammann, Lucca Hirschi, Steve KremerS&P 2024 · 25 citations
- Verifying Indistinguishability of Privacy-Preserving ProtocolsKirby Linvill, Gowtham Kaki, Eric WustrowOOPSLA 2023 · 2 citations
- Hop: A Modern Transport and Remote Access ProtocolPaul Flammarion, George Hosono, Wilson Nguyen, Laura Bauman et al.USENIX Security 2026
- A Comprehensive Formal Security Analysis of OPC UAVincent Diemunsch, Lucca Hirschi, Steve KremerUSENIX Security 2025
- Secure Protocol Composition under Dynamic Corruption: Scaling Up Symbolic Analysis for Real-World Security PropertiesCas Cremers, Erik Pallas, Aleksi PeltonenUSENIX Security 2026
Related papers
- A Comprehensive Symbolic Analysis of TLS 1.3Cas Cremers, Marko Horvat, Jonathan Hoyland, Sam Scott et al.CCS 2017 · 247 citations
- Multiple Handshakes Security of TLS 1.3 CandidatesXinyu Li, Jing Xu, Zhenfeng Zhang, Dengguo Feng et al.S&P 2016 · 32 citations
- Key Confirmation in Key Exchange: A Formal Treatment and Implications for TLS 1.3Marc Fischlin, Felix Günther, Benedikt Schmidt, Bogdan WarinschiS&P 2016 · 1 citation
- Stealth Key Exchange and Confined Access to the Record Protocol Data in TLS 1.3Marc FischlinCCS 2023 · 7 citations
- Verified Models and Reference Implementations for the TLS 1.3 Standard CandidateKarthikeyan Bhargavan, Bruno Blanchet, Nadim KobeissiS&P 2017 · 233 citations
