Lune

UIST2024Top-tier venue

UICrit: Enhancing Automated Design Evaluation with a UI Critique Dataset

Peitong Duan, Chin-Yi Cheng, Gang Li, Bjoern Hartmann, Yang Li

2024Year
22Citations
8Top-tier citations

Abstract

Automated UI evaluation can be beneficial for the design process; for example, to compare different UI designs, or conduct automated heuristic evaluation. LLM-based UI evaluation, in particular, holds the promise of generalizability to a wide variety of UI types and evaluation tasks. However, current LLM-based techniques do not yet match the performance of human evaluators. We hypothesize that automatic evaluation can be improved by collecting a targeted UI feedback dataset and then using this dataset to enhance the performance of general-purpose LLMs. We present a targeted dataset of 3,059 design critiques and quality ratings for 983 mobile UIs, collected from seven experienced designers. We carried out an in-depth analysis to characterize the dataset's features. We then applied this dataset to achieve a 55% performance gain in LLM-generated UI feedback via various few-shot and visual prompting techniques. We also discuss future applications of this dataset, including training a reward model for generative UI techniques, and fine-tuning a tool-agnostic multi-modal LLM that automates UI evaluation.

• Human-centered computing → Systems and tools for interaction design; Empirical studies in HCI.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext facafbe8-710e-4dc0-a19a-af8505b11b43

Cited by top-tier papers8

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on15

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines