Learning nonlinear loop invariants with gated continuous logic networks
Jianan Yao, Gabriel Ryan, Justin Wong, Suman Jana, Ronghui Gu
Abstract
Verifying real-world programs often requires inferring loop invariants with nonlinear constraints. This is especially true in programs that perform many numerical operations, such as control systems for avionics or industrial plants. Recently, data-driven methods for loop invariant inference have shown promise, especially on linear loop invariants. However, applying data-driven inference to nonlinear loop invariants is challenging due to the large numbers of and large magnitudes of high-order terms, the potential for overfitting on a small number of samples, and the large space of possible nonlinear inequality bounds.
In this paper, we introduce a new neural architecture for general SMT learning, the Gated Continuous Logic Network (G-CLN), and apply it to nonlinear loop invariant learning. G-CLNs extend the Continuous Logic Network (CLN) architecture with gating units and dropout, which allow the model to robustly learn general invariants over large numbers of terms. To address overfitting that arises from finite program sampling, we introduce fractional samplingÐa sound relaxation of loop semantics to continuous functions that facilitates unbounded sampling on the real domain. We additionally design a new CLN activation function, the Piecewise Biased Quadratic Unit (PBQU), for naturally learning tight inequality bounds.
We incorporate these methods into a nonlinear loop invariant inference system that can learn general nonlinear loop invariants. We evaluate our system on a benchmark of * Equal contribution
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fa6ae79d-b1d5-47dd-a52f-59a1fed13252Cited by top-tier papers24
- Code Repair with LLMs gives an Exploration-Exploitation TradeoffHao Tang, Keya Hu, Jin Zhou, Sicheng Zhong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 85 citations
- DistAI: Data-Driven Automated Invariant Learning for Distributed ProtocolsJianan Yao, Runzhou Tao, Ronghui Gu, Jason Nieh et al.OSDI 2021 · 76 citations
- Finding Invariants of Distributed Systems: It's a Small (Enough) World After AllTravis Hance, Marijn Heule, Ruben Martins, Bryan ParnoNSDI 2021 · 69 citations
- Enchanting Program Specification Synthesis by Large Language Models Using Static Analysis and Program VerificationCheng Wen, Jialun Cao, Jie Su, Zhiwu Xu et al.CAV 2024 · 60 citations
- DuoAI: Fast, Automated Inference of Inductive Invariants for Verifying Distributed ProtocolsJianan Yao, Runzhou Tao, Ronghui Gu, Jason NiehOSDI 2022 · 50 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Loop Invariant Inference through SMT Solving Enhanced Reinforcement LearningShiwen Yu, Ting Wang, Ji WangISSTA 2023 · 11 citations
- Let a Neural Network be Your InvariantMirco Giacobbe, Daniel Kroening, Abhinandan Pal, Michael TautschnigNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Clause2Inv: A Generate-Combine-Check Framework for Loop Invariant InferenceWeining Cao, Guangyuan Wu, Tangzhi Xu, Yuan Yao et al.ISSTA 2025 · 2 citations
- LLM Meets Bounded Model Checking: Neuro-symbolic Loop Invariant InferenceGuangyuan Wu, Weining Cao, Yuan Yao, Hengfeng Wei et al.ASE 2024 · 9 citations
- Interval counterexamples for loop invariant learningRongchen Xu, Fei He, Bow-Yaw WangFSE 2020 · 19 citations
