Learning to Retrieve from Agent Trajectories
Yuqi Zhou, Sunhao Dai, Changle Qu, Liang Pang, Jun Xu, Ji-Rong Wen
Abstract
Information retrieval (IR) systems have traditionally been designed and trained for human users, with learning-to-rank methods relying heavily on large-scale human interaction logs such as clicks and dwell time. With the rapid emergence of large language model (LLM) powered search agents, however, retrieval is increasingly consumed by agents rather than human beings, and is embedded as a core component within multi-turn reasoning and action loops. In this setting, retrieval models trained under human-centric assumptions can be mismatched with the way agents issue intermediate queries and consume results. In this work, we argue that retrieval models for agentic search should be trained directly from agent interaction data. We study learning to retrieve from agent trajectories as a trajectory-supervised training setting, where supervision is derived from multi-step agent interactions. Through a systematic analysis of search agent trajectories, we identify key behavioral signals that reveal document utility, including browsing actions, unbrowsed rejections, and post-browse reasoning traces. Guided by these insights, we propose LRAT, a simple yet effective framework that mines high-quality retrieval supervision from agent trajectories and incorporates relevance intensity through weighted optimization. To instantiate this setting at scale, we deploy the Tongyi-DeepResearch-30B model on 10K InfoSeekQA queries with four retrievers, collecting 26,482 agent trajectories and constructing 91,713 training pairs. Extensive experiments on both in-domain and out-of-domain deep research benchmarks demonstrate that retrievers trained with LRAT consistently improve evidence recall, end-to-end task success, and execution efficiency across diverse agent architectures and scales. Our results highlight agent trajectories as a practical and scalable supervision source for retrieval in agentic search.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fa57197f-b223-4e9f-aed7-494e20b5d135Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Understand What LLM Needs: Dual Preference Alignment for Retrieval-Augmented GenerationGuanting Dong, Yutao Zhu, Chenghao Zhang, Zechen Wang et al.WWW 2025 · 44 citations
- Information Gain-based Policy Optimization: A Simple and Effective Approach for Multi-Turn Search AgentsGuoqing Wang, Sunhao Dai, Guangze Ye, Zeyu Gan et al.ICLR 2026 · 37 citations
- Are Large Language Models Good at Utility Judgments?Hengran Zhang, Ruqing Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Maarten de Rijke et al.SIGIR 2024 · 20 citations
- Open Data Synthesis for Deep ResearchZiyi Xia, Kun Luo, Hongjin Qian, Siqi Bao et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Search-o1: Agentic Search-Enhanced Large Reasoning ModelsXiaoxi Li, Guanting Dong, Jiajie Jin, Yuyao Zhang et al.EMNLP 2025 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Iterative Self-Incentivization Empowers Large Language Models as Agentic SearchersZhengliang Shi, Lingyong Yan, Dawei Yin, Suzan Verberne et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- Agentic Search in the Wild: Intents and Trajectory Dynamics from 14M+ Real Search RequestsJingjie Ning, João Coelho, Yibo Kong, Yunfan Long et al.SIGIR 2026
- IntentRL: Training Proactive User-intent Agents for Open-ended Deep Research via Reinforcement LearningHaohao Luo, Zexi Li, Yuexiang Xie, Wenhao Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- ReSearch: Learning to Reason with Search for LLMs via Reinforcement LearningMingyang Chen, Linzhuang Sun, Tianpeng Li, Haoze Sun et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 125 citations
- A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Search AgentsYunjia Xi, Jianghao Lin, Yongzhao Xiao, Zheli Zhou et al.ACL 2026 · 1,216 citations
