USENIX Security2024Top-tier venue
Property Existence Inference against Generative Models
Lijin Wang, Jingjing Wang, Jie Wan, Lin Long, Ziqi Yang, Zhan Qin
Abstract
Generative models have served as the backbone of versatile tools with a wide range of applications across various fields in recent years. However, it has been demonstrated that privacy concerns, such as membership information leakage of the training dataset, exist for generative models. In this paper, we perform property existence inference against generative models as a new type of information leakage, which aims to infer whether any samples with a given property are contained in the training set. For example, to infer if any images (i.e., samples) of a specific brand of cars (i.e., property) are used to train the target model. We focus on the leakage of existence information of properties with very low proportions in the training set, which has been overlooked in previous works. We leverage the feature-level consistency of the generated data with the training data to launch inferences and validate the property existence information leakage across diverse architectures of generative models. We have examined various factors influencing the property existence inference and investigated how generated samples leak property existence information. In our conclusion, most generative models are vulnerable to property existence inferences. Additionally, we have validated our attack in Stable Diffusion which is a large-scale open-source generative model in realworld scenarios, and demonstrated its risk of property existence information leakage. The source code is available at https://github.com/wljLlla/PEI_Code .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fa2d61f7-8688-481b-96fe-e430c18d9766Cited by top-tier papers3
- Can We Infer Confidential Properties of Training Data from LLMs?Pengrun Huang, Chhavi Yadav, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Ruihan WuNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- ArtistAuditor: Auditing Artist Style Pirate in Text-to-Image Generation ModelsLinkang Du, Zheng Zhu, Min Chen, Zhou Su et al.WWW 2025 · 5 citations
- SoK: Colluding Adversaries in Machine Learning PipelinesVasisht Duddu, Lipeng He, Asim Waheed, N. AsokanUSENIX Security 2026
Builds on31
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisPrafulla Dhariwal, Alexander Quinn NicholNeurIPS 2021 · 13,211 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit ModelsJiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICLR 2021 · 11,743 citations
- Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language UnderstandingChitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,965 citations
Related papers
- Membership Inference Attacks on Diffusion Models via Quantile RegressionShuai Tang, Steven Wu, Sergül Aydöre, Michael Kearns et al.ICML 2024 · 22 citations
- Property Inference Attacks Against GANsJunhao Zhou, Yufei Chen, Chao Shen, Yang ZhangNDSS 2022
- Inference Attacks Against Graph Generative Diffusion ModelsXiuling Wang, Xin Huang, Guibo Luo, Jianliang XuUSENIX Security 2026
- Black-box Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Diffusion ModelsYan Pang, Tianhao WangNDSS 2025
- Towards Black-Box Membership Inference Attack for Diffusion ModelsJingwei Li, Jing Dong, Tianxing He, Jingzhao ZhangICML 2025
