MisVisFix: An Interactive Dashboard for Detecting, Explaining, and Correcting Misleading Visualizations using Large Language Models
Amit Kumar Das, Klaus Mueller
Abstract
Misleading visualizations pose a significant challenge to accurate data interpretation. While recent research has explored the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for detecting such misinformation, practical tools that also support explanation and correction remain limited. We present MisVisFix, an interactive dashboard that leverages both Claude and GPT models to support the full workflow of detecting, explaining, and correcting misleading visualizations. MisVisFix correctly identifies 96% of visualization issues and addresses all 74 known visualization misinformation types, classifying them as major, minor, or potential concerns. It provides detailed explanations, actionable suggestions, and automatically generates corrected charts. An interactive chat interface allows users to ask about specific chart elements or request modifications. The dashboard adapts to newly emerging misinformation strategies through targeted user interactions. User studies with visualization experts and developers of fact-checking tools show that MisVisFix accurately identifies issues and offers useful suggestions for improvement. By transforming LLM-based detection into an accessible, interactive platform, MisVisFix advances visualization literacy and supports more trustworthy data communication.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f99ed197-0c51-48d3-8ecc-d8cfd8bfd069Cited by top-tier papers3
- Is this chart lying to me? Automating the detection of misleading visualizationsJonathan Tonglet, Jan Zimny, Tinne Tuytelaars, Iryna GurevychACL 2026 · 4 citations
- Debugging Defective Visualizations: Empirical Insights Informing a Human-AI Co‑Debugging SystemShuyu Shen, Sirong Lu, Leixian Shen, Yuyu LuoCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Linting Style and Substance in READMEsHima Mynampaty, Nathania Josephine, Katherine E. Isaacs, Andrew M. McNuttCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on11
- Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science OnlineCrystal Lee, Tanya Yang, Gabrielle D. Inchoco, Graham M. Jones et al.CHI 2021 · 140 citations
- CALVI: Critical Thinking Assessment for Literacy in VisualizationsLily W. Ge, Yuan Cui, Matthew KayCHI 2023 · 68 citations
- VizLinter: A Linter and Fixer Framework for Data VisualizationQing Chen, Fuling Sun, Xinyue Xu, Zui Chen et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 60 citations
- Misleading Beyond Visual Tricks: How People Actually Lie with ChartsMaxim Lisnic, Cole Polychronis, Alexander Lex, Marina KoganCHI 2023 · 54 citations
- Truncating the Y-Axis: Threat or Menace?Michael Correll, Enrico Bertini, Steven FranconeriCHI 2020 · 51 citations
Related papers
- How Good (Or Bad) Are LLMs at Detecting Misleading Visualizations?Leo Yu-Ho Lo, Huamin QuIEEE VIS 2024 · 24 citations
- Protecting multimodal large language models against misleading visualizationsJonathan Tonglet, Tinne Tuytelaars, Marie-Francine Moens, Iryna GurevychACL 2026 · 8 citations
- Unmasking Deceptive Visuals: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models on Misleading Chart Question AnsweringZixin Chen, Sicheng Song, KaShun Shum, Yanna Lin et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Charts-of-Thought: Enhancing LLM Visualization Literacy Through Structured Data ExtractionAmit Kumar Das, Mohammad Tarun, Klaus MuellerIEEE VIS 2025 · 6 citations
- An Empirical Evaluation of the GPT-4 Multimodal Language Model on Visualization Literacy TasksAlexander Bendeck, John T. StaskoIEEE VIS 2024 · 40 citations
