Automated Hypothesis Validation with Agentic Sequential Falsifications
Kexin Huang, Ying Jin, Ryan Li, Michael Y. Li, Emmanuel J. Candès, Jure Leskovec
Abstract
Hypotheses are central to information acquisition, decision-making, and discovery. However, many real-world hypotheses are abstract, highlevel statements that are difficult to validate directly. This challenge is further intensified by the rise of hypothesis generation from Large Language Models (LLMs), which are prone to hallucination and produce hypotheses in volumes that make manual validation impractical. Here we propose POPPER, an agentic framework for rigorous automated validation of free-form hypotheses. Guided by Karl Popper's principle of falsification, POPPER validates a hypothesis using LLM agents that design and execute falsification experiments targeting its measurable implications. A novel sequential testing framework ensures strict Type-I error control while actively gathering evidence from diverse observations, whether drawn from existing data or newly conducted procedures. We demonstrate POPPER on six domains including biology, economics, and sociology. POPPER delivers robust error control, high power, and scalability. Furthermore, compared to human scientists, POPPER achieved comparable performance in validating complex biological hypotheses while reducing time by 10 folds, providing a scalable, rigorous solution for hypothesis validation. POP-PER is freely available at https://github. com/snap-stanford/POPPER .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- AutoDiscovery: Open-ended Scientific Discovery via Bayesian SurpriseDhruv Agarwal, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Reece Adamson, Megha Chakravorty et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 35 citations
- HeurekaBench: A Benchmarking Framework for AI Co-scientistSiba Smarak Panigrahi, Jovana Videnovic, Maria BrbicICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- CausalGame: Benchmarking Causal Thinking of LLM Agents in GamesZhenhao Chen, Yongqiang Chen, Chenxi Liu, Junchi Yu et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on8
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Hypothesis Search: Inductive Reasoning with Language ModelsRuocheng Wang, Eric Zelikman, Gabriel Poesia, Yewen Pu et al.ICLR 2024 · 156 citations
- Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis RefinementLinlu Qiu, Liwei Jiang, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar et al.ICLR 2024 · 114 citations
- Instruction Induction: From Few Examples to Natural Language Task DescriptionsOr Honovich, Uri Shaham, Samuel R. Bowman, Omer LevyACL 2023 · 48 citations
- A large-scale benchmark for few-shot program induction and synthesisFerran Alet, Javier Lopez-Contreras, James Koppel, Maxwell I. Nye et al.ICML 2021 · 20 citations
Related papers
- Principle-Evolvable Scientific Discovery via Uncertainty MinimizationYingming Pu, Tao LIN, Hongyu ChenICML 2026 · 4 citations
- SpecOps: A Fully Automated AI Agent Testing Framework in Real-World GUI EnvironmentsSyed Yusuf Ahmed, Shiwei Feng, Chanwoo Bae, Calix Barrus et al.ICSE 2026
- MOOSE-Chem: Large Language Models for Rediscovering Unseen Chemistry Scientific HypothesesZonglin Yang, Wanhao Liu, Ben Gao, Tong Xie et al.ICLR 2025 · 2 citations
- Agentic Proposing: Enhancing Large language Model Reasoning via Compositional Skill SynthesisZhengbo Jiao, Shaobo Wang, Zifan Zhang, Xuan Ren et al.ICML 2026 · 10 citations
- STARK: Strategic Team of Agents for Refining KernelsJuncheng Dong, Yang Yang, Tao Liu, Yang Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 26 citations
