AlphaFold Database Debiasing for Robust Inverse Folding
Cheng Tan, Zhenxiao Cao, Zhangyang Gao, Siyuan Li, Yufei Huang, Stan Z. Li
Abstract
The AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (AFDB) offers unparalleled structural coverage at near-experimental accuracy, positioning it as a valuable resource for data-driven protein design. However, its direct use in training deep models that are sensitive to fine-grained atomic geometry-such as inverse folding-exposes a critical limitation. Comparative analysis of structural feature distributions reveals that AFDB structures exhibit distinct statistical regularities, reflecting a systematic geometric bias that deviates from the conformational diversity found in experimentally determined structures from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). While AFDB structures are cleaner and more idealized, PDB structures capture the intrinsic variability and physical realism essential for generalization in downstream tasks. To address this discrepancy, we introduce a Debiasing Structure AutoEncoder (DeSAE) that learns to reconstruct native-like conformations from intentionally corrupted backbone geometries. By training the model to recover plausible structural states, DeSAE implicitly captures a more robust and natural structural manifold. At inference, applying DeSAE to AFDB structures produces debiased representations that significantly improve inverse folding performance across multiple benchmarks, and also enhance other structure-conditioned modeling tasks. This work highlights the critical impact of subtle systematic biases in predicted structures and presents a principled framework for debiasing, significantly boosting the performance of structure-based learning tasks like inverse folding.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f91151f5-32ce-483c-8f25-e22396506d9dBuilds on32
- Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector PerceptronsBowen Jing, Stephan Eismann, Patricia Suriana, Raphael John Lamarre Townshend et al.ICLR 2021 · 627 citations
- Learning inverse folding from millions of predicted structuresChloe Hsu, Robert Verkuil, Jason Liu, Zeming Lin et al.ICML 2022 · 560 citations
- EquiBind: Geometric Deep Learning for Drug Binding Structure PredictionHannes Stärk, Octavian Ganea, Lagnajit Pattanaik, Regina Barzilay et al.ICML 2022 · 360 citations
- Antigen-Specific Antibody Design and Optimization with Diffusion-Based Generative Models for Protein StructuresShitong Luo, Yufeng Su, Xingang Peng, Sheng Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 331 citations
- DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular DockingGabriele Corso, Hannes Stärk, Bowen Jing, Regina Barzilay et al.ICLR 2023 · 331 citations
Related papers
- Evaluating Representation Learning on the Protein Structure UniverseArian Rokkum Jamasb, Alex Morehead, Chaitanya K. Joshi, Zuobai Zhang et al.ICLR 2024 · 26 citations
- Protein Fold Classification at Scale: Benchmarking and PretrainingDexiong Chen, Andrei Manolache, Mathias Niepert, Karsten BorgwardtICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Rigidity-Aware Geometric Pretraining for Protein Design and Conformational EnsemblesZhanghan Ni, Yanjing Li, Zeju Qiu, Bernhard Schölkopf et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- ProteinAE: Protein Diffusion Autoencoders for Structure EncodingShaoning Li, Le Zhuo, Yusong Wang, Mingyu Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Learning conformational ensembles of proteins based on backbone geometryNicolas Wolf, Leif Seute, Vsevolod Viliuga, Simon Wagner et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
