Lune

ICML2025Top-tier venue

Pruning for GNNs: Lower Complexity with Comparable Expressiveness

Dun Ma, Jianguo Chen, Wenguo Yang, Suixiang Gao, Shengminjie Chen

Abstract

In recent years, the pursuit of higher expressive power in graph neural networks (GNNs) has often led to more complex aggregation mechanisms and deeper architectures. To address these issues, we have identified redundant structures in GNNs, and by pruning them, we propose Pruned MP-GNNs, K-Path GNNs, and K-Hop GNNs based on their original architectures. We show that 1) Although some structures are pruned in Pruned MP-GNNs and Pruned K-Path GNNs, their expressive power has not been compromised. 2) K-Hop MP-GNNs and their pruned architecture exhibit equivalent expressiveness on regular and strongly regular graphs. 3) The complexity of pruned K-Path GNNs and pruned K-Hop GNNs is lower than that of MP-GNNs, yet their expressive power is higher. Experimental results validate our refinements, demonstrating competitive performance across benchmark datasets with improved efficiency. K-Path Message Passing Framework. The K-Path GNN extends the standard message passing to consider paths of length k (1 ≤ k ≤ K). Specifically, each k-path neighbor set N k path (v) is aggregated independently and then combined. Specifically, A node can appear multiple times as a k-path neighbor of v, allowing the algorithm to capture repeated walks of length k. We use (G, G ′ ) ∈ GI L K-P to denote that the K-Path WL test decides G and G ′ are isomorphic after L iterations. K-Hop Message Passing Framework. The K-Hop GNN differs by focusing on shortest-path neighbors. Each node

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on14

  1. Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Cellular: CW NetworksCristian Bodnar, Fabrizio Frasca, Nina Otter, Yuguang Wang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 330 citations
  2. Identity-aware Graph Neural NetworksJiaxuan You, Jonathan Michael Gomes Selman, Rex Ying, Jure LeskovecAAAI 2021 · 316 citations
  3. Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Topological: Message Passing Simplicial NetworksCristian Bodnar, Fabrizio Frasca, Yuguang Wang, Nina Otter et al.ICML 2021 · 315 citations
  4. Equivariant Subgraph Aggregation NetworksBeatrice Bevilacqua, Fabrizio Frasca, Derek Lim, Balasubramaniam Srinivasan et al.ICLR 2022 · 217 citations
  5. Nested Graph Neural NetworksMuhan Zhang, Pan LiNeurIPS 2021 · 213 citations

Related papers

  1. How Powerful are K-hop Message Passing Graph Neural NetworksJiarui Feng, Yixin Chen, Fuhai Li, Anindya Sarkar et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 188 citations
  2. From Stars to Subgraphs: Uplifting Any GNN with Local Structure AwarenessLingxiao Zhao, Wei Jin, Leman Akoglu, Neil ShahICLR 2022 · 213 citations
  3. Path Neural Networks: Expressive and Accurate Graph Neural NetworksGaspard Michel, Giannis Nikolentzos, Johannes F. Lutzeyer, Michalis VazirgiannisICML 2023 · 45 citations
  4. Redundancy-Free Message Passing for Graph Neural NetworksRongqin Chen, Shenghui Zhang, Leong Hou U, Ye LiNeurIPS 2022 · 19 citations
  5. The Expressive Power of Path-Based Graph Neural NetworksCaterina Graziani, Tamara Drucks, Fabian Jogl, Monica Bianchini et al.ICML 2024 · 13 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines