Revisiting Simple Regret: Fast Rates for Returning a Good Arm
Yao Zhao, Connor Stephens, Csaba Szepesvári, Kwang-Sung Jun
Abstract
Simple regret is a natural and parameter-free performance criterion for pure exploration in multi-armed bandits yet is less popular than the probability of missing the best arm or an -good arm, perhaps due to lack of easy ways to characterize it. In this paper, we make significant progress on minimizing simple regret in both data-rich () and data-poor regime () where is the number of arms, and is the number of samples. At its heart is our improved instance-dependent analysis of the well-known Sequential Halving (SH) algorithm, where we bound the probability of returning an arm whose mean reward is not within from the best (i.e., not -good) for any choice of , although is not an input to SH. Our bound not only leads to an optimal worst-case simple regret bound of up to logarithmic factors but also essentially matches the instance-dependent lower bound for returning an -good arm reported by Katz-Samuels and Jamieson (2020). For the more challenging data-poor regime, we propose Bracketing SH (BSH) that enjoys the same improvement even without sampling each arm at least once. Our empirical study shows that BSH outperforms existing methods on real-world tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f8cac5c5-cf02-46ab-8b0c-808fbf4b65d2Cited by top-tier papers13
- An ε-Best-Arm Identification Algorithm for Fixed-Confidence and BeyondMarc Jourdan, Rémy Degenne, Emilie KaufmannNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
- Noise-Adaptive Confidence Sets for Linear Bandits and Application to Bayesian OptimizationKwang-Sung Jun, Jungtaek KimICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Adaptive Variance Inflation in Thompson Sampling: Efficiency, Safety, Robustness, and BeyondFeng Zhu, David Simchi-LeviNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Evolution of Information in Interactive Decision Making: A Case Study for Multi-Armed BanditsYuzhou Gu, Yanjun Han, Jian QianNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Fixed Budget is No Harder Than Fixed Confidence in Best-Arm Identification up to Logarithmic FactorsKapilan Balagopalan, Yinan Li, Yao Zhao, Tuan Nguyen et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on5
- High-dimensional Experimental Design and Kernel BanditsRomain Camilleri, Kevin Jamieson, Julian Katz-SamuelsICML 2021 · 63 citations
- Bandits with many optimal armsRianne de Heide, James Cheshire, Pierre Ménard, Alexandra CarpentierNeurIPS 2021 · 28 citations
- PopArt: Efficient Sparse Regression and Experimental Design for Optimal Sparse Linear BanditsKyoungseok Jang, Chicheng Zhang, Kwang-Sung JunNeurIPS 2022 · 18 citations
- An Optimal Elimination Algorithm for Learning a Best ArmAvinatan Hassidim, Ron Kupfer, Yaron SingerNeurIPS 2020 · 17 citations
- Crush Optimism with Pessimism: Structured Bandits Beyond Asymptotic OptimalityKwang-Sung Jun, Chicheng ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Multiplier Bootstrap-based ExplorationRunzhe Wan, Haoyu Wei, Branislav Kveton, Rui SongICML 2023 · 3 citations
- Lenient Regret for Multi-Armed BanditsNadav Merlis, Shie MannorAAAI 2021 · 10 citations
- The Batch Complexity of Bandit Pure ExplorationAdrienne Tuynman, Rémy DegenneICML 2025
- Asymptotically Optimal Quantile Pure Exploration for Infinite-Armed BanditsEvelyn Xiao-Yue Gong, Mark SellkeNeurIPS 2023 · 4 citations
- Near-Optimal Collaborative Learning in BanditsClémence Réda, Sattar Vakili, Emilie KaufmannNeurIPS 2022 · 23 citations
