Observable Propagation: Uncovering Feature Vectors in Transformers
Jacob Dunefsky, Arman Cohan
Abstract
A key goal of current mechanistic interpretability research in NLP is to find linear features (also called"feature vectors") for transformers: directions in activation space corresponding to concepts that are used by a given model in its computation. Present state-of-the-art methods for finding linear features require large amounts of labelled data -- both laborious to acquire and computationally expensive to utilize. In this work, we introduce a novel method, called"observable propagation"(in short: ObProp), for finding linear features used by transformer language models in computing a given task -- using almost no data. Our paradigm centers on the concept of"observables", linear functionals corresponding to given tasks. We then introduce a mathematical theory for the analysis of feature vectors, including a similarity metric between feature vectors called the coupling coefficient which estimates the degree to which one feature's output correlates with another's. We use ObProp to perform extensive qualitative investigations into several tasks, including gendered occupational bias, political party prediction, and programming language detection. Our results suggest that ObProp surpasses traditional approaches for finding feature vectors in the low-data regime, and that ObProp can be used to better understand the mechanisms responsible for bias in large language models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic InterpretabilityArthur Conmy, Augustine N. Mavor-Parker, Aengus Lynch, Stefan Heimersheim et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 861 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
Related papers
- Enhancing Automated Interpretability with Output-Centric Feature DescriptionsYoav Gur-Arieh, Roy Mayan, Chen Agassy, Atticus Geiger et al.ACL 2025
- Mechanisms vs. Outcomes: Probing for Syntax Fails to Explain Performance on Targeted Syntactic EvaluationsAnanth Agarwal, Jasper Jian, Christopher D. Manning, Shikhar MurtyEMNLP 2025 · 5 citations
- Beyond Components: Singular Vector-Based Interpretability of Transformer CircuitsAreeb Ahmad, Abhinav Joshi, Ashutosh ModiNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Emergence of Linear Truth Encodings in Language ModelsShauli Ravfogel, Gilad Yehudai, Tal Linzen, Joan Bruna et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Monitoring Latent World States in Language Models with Propositional ProbesJiahai Feng, Stuart Russell, Jacob SteinhardtICLR 2025
