Layer-wise linear mode connectivity
Linara Adilova, Maksym Andriushchenko, Michael Kamp, Asja Fischer, Martin Jaggi
Abstract
Averaging neural network parameters is an intuitive method for fusing the knowledge of two independent models. It is most prominently used in federated learning. If models are averaged at the end of training, this can only lead to a good performing model if the loss surface of interest is very particular, i.e., the loss in the midpoint between the two models needs to be sufficiently low. This is impossible to guarantee for the non-convex losses of state-of-the-art networks. For averaging models trained on vastly different datasets, it was proposed to average only the parameters of particular layers or combinations of layers, resulting in better performing models. To get a better understanding of the effect of layer-wise averaging, we analyse the performance of the models that result from averaging single layers, or groups of layers. Based on our empirical and theoretical investigation, we introduce a novel notion of the layer-wise linear connectivity, and show that deep networks do not have layer-wise barriers between them. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f81aa511-e905-4225-bd99-7c970992d0feCited by top-tier papers18
- On the Emergence of Cross-Task Linearity in Pretraining-Finetuning ParadigmZhanpeng Zhou, Zijun Chen, Yilan Chen, Bo Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 26 citations
- Generalized Linear Mode Connectivity for TransformersAlexander Theus, Alessandro Cabodi, Sotiris Anagnostidis, Antonio Orvieto et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations
- Flatness is Necessary, Neural Collapse is Not: Rethinking Generalization via GrokkingTing Han, Linara Adilova, Henning Petzka, Jens Kleesiek et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- One Token Embedding Is Enough to Deadlock Your Large Reasoning ModelMohan Zhang, Yihua Zhang, Jinghan Jia, Zhangyang (Atlas) Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Flexible Sharpness-Aware Personalized Federated LearningXinda Xing, Qiugang Zhan, Xiurui Xie, Yuning Yang et al.AAAI 2025 · 5 citations
Builds on32
- Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain AdaptationXingchao Peng, Qinxun Bai, Xide Xia, Zijun Huang et al.ICCV 2019 · 2,239 citations
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timeMitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Rebecca Roelofs et al.ICML 2022 · 1,464 citations
- Federated Learning with Matched AveragingHongyi Wang, Mikhail Yurochkin, Yuekai Sun, Dimitris S. Papailiopoulos et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,368 citations
- FedBN: Federated Learning on Non-IID Features via Local Batch NormalizationXiaoxiao Li, Meirui Jiang, Xiaofei Zhang, Michael Kamp et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,166 citations
Related papers
- Layer-Wise Adaptive Model Aggregation for Scalable Federated LearningSunwoo Lee, Tuo Zhang, Amir Salman AvestimehrAAAI 2023 · 87 citations
- FedAvg Converges to Zero Training Loss Linearly for Overparameterized Multi-Layer Neural NetworksBingqing Song, Prashant Khanduri, Xinwei Zhang, Jinfeng Yi et al.ICML 2023 · 10 citations
- Widening the Network Mitigates the Impact of Data Heterogeneity on FedAvgLike Jian, Dong LiuICML 2025
- Model Fusion via Optimal TransportSidak Pal Singh, Martin JaggiNeurIPS 2020 · 330 citations
- Git Re-Basin: Merging Models modulo Permutation SymmetriesSamuel K. Ainsworth, Jonathan Hayase, Siddhartha S. SrinivasaICLR 2023 · 32 citations
