Why AI Agents Still Need You: Findings from Developer-Agent Collaborations in the Wild
Aayush Kumar, Yasharth Bajpai, Sumit Gulwani, Gustavo Soares, Emerson R. Murphy-Hill
Abstract
Software Engineering Agents (SWE agents) can autonomously perform development tasks on benchmarks like SWE Bench, but still face challenges when tackling complex and ambiguous real-world tasks. Consequently, SWE agents are often designed to allow interactivity with developers, enabling collaborative problem-solving. To understand how developers collaborate with SWE agents and the barriers they face in such interactions, we observed 19 developers using an in-IDE agent to resolve 33 open issues in repositories to which they had previously contributed. Participants successfully resolved about half of these issues, with those solving issues incrementally having greater success than those using a one-shot approach. Participants who actively collaborated with the agent and iterated on its outputs were also more successful, though they faced challenges in trusting the agent’s responses and collaborating on debugging and testing. Our findings suggest that to facilitate successful collaborations, both SWE agents and developers should actively contribute to tasks throughout all stages of the software development process. SWE agents can enable this by challenging and engaging in discussions with developers, rather than being conclusive or sycophantic.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f78b0261-0c4d-407a-b3dc-96465aef15c8Builds on14
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2,059 citations
- Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating ModelsShraddha Barke, Michael B. James, Nadia PolikarpovaOOPSLA 2023 · 408 citations
- Using an LLM to Help With Code UnderstandingDaye Nam, Andrew Macvean, Vincent J. Hellendoorn, Bogdan Vasilescu et al.ICSE 2024 · 264 citations
- Reading Between the Lines: Modeling User Behavior and Costs in AI-Assisted ProgrammingHussein Mozannar, Gagan Bansal, Adam Fourney, Eric HorvitzCHI 2024 · 88 citations
Related papers
- Can Agent Fix Agent Issues?Alfin Wijaya Rahardja, Junwei Liu, Weitong Chen, Zhenpeng Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- SWE-Search: Enhancing Software Agents with Monte Carlo Tree Search and Iterative RefinementAntonis Antoniades, Albert Örwall, Kexun Zhang, Yuxi Xie et al.ICLR 2025
- Ambig-SWE: Interactive Agents to Overcome Underspecificity in Software EngineeringSanidhya Vijayvargiya, Xuhui Zhou, Akhila Yerukola, Maarten Sap et al.ICLR 2026 · 35 citations
- Beyond Final Code: A Process-Oriented Error Analysis of Software Development Agents in Real-World GitHub ScenariosZhi Chen, Wei Ma, Lingxiao JiangICSE 2026
- TOM-SWE: User Mental Modeling For Software Engineering AgentsXuhui Zhou, Valerie Chen, Zhiruo Wang, Graham Neubig et al.ICML 2026 · 12 citations
