MagicBench: Diagnosing Visual Agency Loss and Semantic Dependency in Multimodal LLMs
Tang Da Huang, Weidong Tang, Wen Qi Xu, Xianpeng Guo
Abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models typically assume linguistic context invariably enhances visual understanding. We study this assumption in semantic adversarial scenarios, specifically magic tricks, where narration deliberately diverges from physical reality. We introduce MagicBench, a diagnostic benchmark of 402 videos for evaluating MLLMs under hierarchical linguistic interference, together with a Physical Constraint Set (PCS) protocol for assessing adherence to physical laws. Evaluation uncovers a Semantic Dependency Paradox: (1) Semantic anchoring: Entity nouns act as anchors aiding localization, paradoxically boosting performance despite false predicates. (2) Visual Agency Loss: In semantic vacuums, multimodal performance collapses 12.4% (p < 0.01) below the vision-only capability probe. This gap persists under symmetric prompting, suggesting a form of functional perception suppression in which autonomous visual search may be under-utilized in multimodal settings without linguistic triggers. Causal interventions via spatial prompting and signal magnification provide evidence that internal reasoning remains functional, supporting the interpretation of a perceptual access bottleneck. Our findings suggest MLLMs function as language-guided passive observers, advocating for perceptuallyindependent architectures that decouple sensory agency from linguistic dominance. Code and dataset are available at https://github. com/Ink-Dawn/MagicBench
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f7160da4-6953-4047-b416-32cfc78b7e02Builds on13
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot LearningJean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 6,707 citations
- MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated CapabilitiesWeihao Yu, Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 1,191 citations
- VisionLLM: Large Language Model is also an Open-Ended Decoder for Vision-Centric TasksWenhai Wang, Zhe Chen, Xiaokang Chen, Jiannan Wu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 725 citations
Related papers
- OmniVideoBench: Towards Audio-Visual Understanding Evaluation for Omni MLLMsCaorui Li, Yu Chen, Yiyan Ji, Jin Xu et al.ICLR 2026 · 53 citations
- GlitchBench: Can Large Multimodal Models Detect Video Game Glitches?Mohammad Reza Taesiri, Tianjun Feng, Cor-Paul Bezemer, Anh NguyenCVPR 2024 · 7 citations
- MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMsYusu Qian, Hanrong Ye, Jean-Philippe Fauconnier, Peter Grasch et al.ICLR 2025
- CODIS: Benchmarking Context-dependent Visual Comprehension for Multimodal Large Language ModelsFuwen Luo, Chi Chen, Zihao Wan, Zhaolu Kang et al.ACL 2024 · 3 citations
- MC-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Context Visual Grounding in the Era of MLLMsYunqiu Xu, Linchao Zhu, Yi YangICCV 2025 · 7 citations
