An Effectiveness Metric for Ordinal Classification: Formal Properties and Experimental Results
Enrique Amigó, Julio Gonzalo, Stefano Mizzaro, Jorge Carrillo-de-Albornoz
Abstract
In Ordinal Classification tasks, items have to be assigned to classes that have a relative ordering, such as positive, neutral, negative in sentiment analysis. Remarkably, the most popular evaluation metrics for ordinal classification tasks either ignore relevant information (for instance, precision/recall on each of the classes ignores their relative ordering) or assume additional information (for instance, Mean Average Error assumes absolute distances between classes). In this paper we propose a new metric for Ordinal Classification, Closeness Evaluation Measure, that is rooted on Measurement Theory and Information Theory. Our theoretical analysis and experimental results over both synthetic data and data from NLP shared tasks indicate that the proposed metric captures quality aspects from different traditional tasks simultaneously. In addition, it generalizes some popular classification (nominal scale) and error minimization (interval scale) metrics, depending on the measurement scale in which it is instantiated.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f6ffddb4-fa98-472c-86ed-f957f51ebb8fCited by top-tier papers6
- Ranking Interruptus: When Truncated Rankings Are Better and How to Measure ThatEnrique Amigó, Stefano Mizzaro, Damiano SpinaSIGIR 2022 · 6 citations
- SLACE: A Monotone and Balance-Sensitive Loss Function for Ordinal RegressionInbar Nachmani, Bar Genossar, Coral Scharf, Roee Shraga et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Evaluating Evaluation Measures for Ordinal Classification and Ordinal QuantificationTetsuya SakaiACL 2021
- Contrastive Order Learning: A General Framework for Ordinal RegressionChaewon Lee, BeomJun Shim, Kwang Choi, Chang-Su KimICML 2026
- A Dual-Perspective NLG Meta-Evaluation Framework with Automatic Benchmark and Better InterpretabilityXinyu Hu, Mingqi Gao, Li Lin, Zhenghan Yu et al.ACL 2025
Related papers
- Evaluating Extreme Hierarchical Multi-label ClassificationEnrique Amigó, Agustín D. DelgadoACL 2022
- To Err Like Human: Affective Bias-Inspired Measures for Visual Emotion Recognition EvaluationChenxi Zhao, Jinglei Shi, Liqiang Nie, Jufeng YangNeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
- An Ordinal Data Clustering Algorithm with Automated Distance LearningYiqun Zhang, Yiu-ming CheungAAAI 2020 · 28 citations
- Better than Average: Paired Evaluation of NLP systemsMaxime Peyrard, Wei Zhao, Steffen Eger, Robert WestACL 2021
- Field-aware Calibration: A Simple and Empirically Strong Method for Reliable Probabilistic PredictionsFeiyang Pan, Xiang Ao, Pingzhong Tang, Min Lu et al.WWW 2020 · 30 citations
