Understanding Programmatic Weak Supervision via Source-aware Influence Function
Jieyu Zhang, Haonan Wang, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Alexander J. Ratner
Abstract
Programmatic Weak Supervision (PWS) aggregates the source votes of multiple weak supervision sources into probabilistic training labels, which are in turn used to train an end model. With its increasing popularity, it is critical to have some tool for users to understand the influence of each component (e.g., the source vote or training data) in the pipeline and interpret the end model behavior. To achieve this, we build on Influence Function (IF) and propose source-aware IF, which leverages the generation process of the probabilistic labels to decompose the end model's training objective and then calculate the influence associated with each (data, source, class) tuple. These primitive influence score can then be used to estimate the influence of individual component of PWS, such as source vote, supervision source, and training data. On datasets of diverse domains, we demonstrate multiple use cases: (1) interpreting incorrect predictions from multiple angles that reveals insights for debugging the PWS pipeline, (2) identifying mislabeling of sources with a gain of 9%-37% over baselines, and (3) improving the end model's generalization performance by removing harmful components in the training objective (13%-24% better than ordinary IF).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f6c57323-4e4e-4266-93aa-b4adc3ca9c07Cited by top-tier papers6
- Theoretical Analysis of Weak-to-Strong GeneralizationHunter Lang, David A. Sontag, Aravindan VijayaraghavanNeurIPS 2024 · 59 citations
- LabelAId: Just-in-time AI Interventions for Improving Human Labeling Quality and Domain Knowledge in Crowdsourcing SystemsChu Li, Zhihan Zhang, Michael Saugstad, Esteban Safranchik et al.CHI 2024 · 12 citations
- Characterizing the Impacts of Semi-supervised Learning for Weak SupervisionJeffrey Li, Jieyu Zhang, Ludwig Schmidt, Alexander J. RatnerNeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- Fusing Conditional Submodular GAN and Programmatic Weak SupervisionKumar Shubham, Pranav Sastry, Prathosh APAAAI 2024 · 3 citations
- Refining Labeling Functions with Limited Labeled DataChenjie Li, Amir Gilad, Boris Glavic, Zhengjie Miao et al.KDD 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on15
- Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain AdaptationXingchao Peng, Qinxun Bai, Xide Xia, Zijun Huang et al.ICCV 2019 · 2,239 citations
- Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet MethodsDaniel Y. Fu, Mayee F. Chen, Frederic Sala, Sarah M. Hooper et al.ICML 2020 · 130 citations
- BOND: BERT-Assisted Open-Domain Named Entity Recognition with Distant SupervisionChen Liang, Yue Yu, Haoming Jiang, Siawpeng Er et al.KDD 2020 · 118 citations
- Weakly Supervised Sequence Tagging from Noisy RulesEsteban Safranchik, Shiying Luo, Stephen H. BachAAAI 2020 · 90 citations
- Resolving Training Biases via Influence-based Data RelabelingShuming Kong, Yanyan Shen, Linpeng HuangICLR 2022 · 71 citations
Related papers
- Learning Hyper Label Model for Programmatic Weak SupervisionRenzhi Wu, Shen-En Chen, Jieyu Zhang, Xu ChuICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- WeShap: Weak Supervision Source Evaluation with Shapley ValuesNaiqing Guan, Nick KoudasVLDB 2025
- End-to-End Weak SupervisionSalva Rühling Cachay, Benedikt Boecking, Artur DubrawskiNeurIPS 2021 · 48 citations
- Statistical Analysis of an Adversarial Bayesian Weak Supervision MethodSteven AnNeurIPS 2025
- Robust Weak Supervision with Variational Auto-EncodersFrancesco Tonolini, Nikolaos Aletras, Yunlong Jiao, Gabriella KazaiICML 2023 · 7 citations
