Explicit Learning and the LLM in Machine Translation
Malik Marmonier, Rachel Bawden, Benoît Sagot
Abstract
This study explores an LLM's ability to learn new languages using explanations found in a grammar book-a process we term "explicit learning." To rigorously assess this ability, we design controlled translation experiments between English and constructed languages generated-through specific cryptographic means-from Latin or French. Contrary to previous studies, our results demonstrate that LLMs do possess a measurable capacity for explicit learning. This ability, however, diminishes as the complexity of the linguistic phenomena to be learned increases. Supervised fine-tuning on ad hoc chains of thought significantly enhances LLM performance but struggles to generalize to typologically novel or more complex linguistic features. These findings point to the need for more diverse training sets and alternative fine-tuning strategies to further improve explicit learning by LLMs, benefiting low-resource languages typically described in grammar books but lacking extensive corpora.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f631d690-3cc9-4442-be57-855da1bfa0f3Cited by top-tier papers2
- Understanding In-Context Machine Translation for Low-Resource Languages: A Case Study on ManchuRenhao Pei, Yihong Liu, Peiqin Lin, François Yvon et al.ACL 2025 · 11 citations
- ConlangCrafter: Constructing Languages with a Multi-Hop LLM PipelineMorris Alper, Moran Yanuka, Raja Giryes, Gasper BegusACL 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on5
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingMelanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Alane SuhrICLR 2024 · 682 citations
- Mission: Impossible Language ModelsJulie Kallini, Isabel Papadimitriou, Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald et al.ACL 2024 · 15 citations
- PuzzLing Machines: A Challenge on Learning From Small DataGözde Gül Sahin, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Phillip Rust, Iryna GurevychACL 2020
- Can LLMs Really Learn to Translate a Low-Resource Language from One Grammar Book?Seth Aycock, David Stap, Di Wu, Christof Monz et al.ICLR 2025
Related papers
- I Learn Better If You Speak My Language: Understanding the Superior Performance of Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with LLM-Generated ResponsesXuan Ren, Biao Wu, Lingqiao LiuEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?Zorik Gekhman, Gal Yona, Roee Aharoni, Matan Eyal et al.EMNLP 2024 · 53 citations
- Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Language Models via Implicit InferenceSuhas Kotha, Jacob Mitchell Springer, Aditi RaghunathanICLR 2024 · 131 citations
- Enhancing Non-English Capabilities of English-Centric Large Language Models Through Deep Supervision Fine-TuningWenshuai Huo, Xiaocheng Feng, Yichong Huang, Chengpeng Fu et al.AAAI 2025 · 11 citations
- From f(x) and g(x) to f(g(x)): LLMs Learn New Skills in RL by Composing Old OnesLifan Yuan, Weize Chen, Yuchen Zhang, Ganqu Cui et al.ICLR 2026 · 46 citations
