Semantic Exploration with Adaptive Gating for Efficient Problem Solving with Language Models
Sungjae Lee, Hyejin Park, Jaechang Kim, Jungseul Ok
Abstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable potential in various complex tasks requiring multi-step reasoning methods like tree search to explore diverse reasoning paths. However, existing methods often suffer from computational inefficiency and redundancy. First, they overlook the diversity of task difficulties, leading to unnecessarily extensive searches even for easy tasks. Second, they neglect the semantics of reasoning paths, resulting in redundant exploration of semantically identical paths. To address these limitations, we propose Semantic Exploration with Adaptive Gating (SEAG), a computationally efficient method. SEAG employs an adaptive gating mechanism that dynamically decides whether to conduct a tree search, based on the confidence level of answers from a preceding simple reasoning method. Furthermore, its tree-based exploration consolidates semantically identical reasoning steps, reducing redundant explorations while maintaining or even improving accuracy. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that SEAG significantly improves accuracy by 4.3% on average while requiring only 31% of computational costs compared to existing tree search-based methods on complex reasoning benchmarks including GSM8K and ARC with diverse language models such as Llama2, Llama3, and Mistral. Our code is available at https://github.com/ml-postech/SEAGsemantic-exploration-with-adaptive-gating .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f5f91346-02e8-4bee-b132-46a189c1580bCited by top-tier papers3
- Variation in Verification: Understanding Verification Dynamics in Large Language ModelsYefan Zhou, Austin Xu, Yilun Zhou, Janvijay Singh et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Adaptive Planning for Multi-Attribute Controllable Summarization with Monte Carlo Tree SearchSangwon Ryu, Heejin Do, Yunsu Kim, Gary Geunbae Lee et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- The LLM Already Knows: Estimating LLM-Perceived Question Difficulty via Hidden RepresentationsYubo Zhu, Dongrui Liu, Zecheng Lin, Wei Tong et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on20
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Deberta: decoding-Enhanced Bert with Disentangled AttentionPengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2021 · 3,729 citations
Related papers
- Reinforced Efficient Reasoning via Semantically Diverse ExplorationZiqi Zhao, Zhaochun Ren, Jiahong Zou, Liu Yang et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- DSG-MCTS: A Dynamic Strategy-Guided Monte Carlo Tree Search for Diversified Reasoning in Large Language ModelsRui Ha, Chaozhuo Li, Rui Pu, Litian Zhang et al.EMNLP 2025
- Don't Get Lost in the Trees: Streamlining LLM Reasoning by Overcoming Tree Search Exploration PitfallsAnte Wang, Linfeng Song, Ye Tian, Dian Yu et al.ACL 2025 · 9 citations
- Policy Guided Tree Search for Enhanced LLM ReasoningYang LiICML 2025
- RouteGoT: Node-Adaptive Routing for Cost-Efficient Graph of Thoughts ReasoningYuhang Liu, Ruijie Wang, Yunlong Chu, Bing Hao et al.KDD 2026 · 1 citation
