ClickShield: Are You Hiding Something? Towards Eradicating Clickjacking on Android
Andrea Possemato, Andrea Lanzi, Simon Pak Ho Chung, Wenke Lee, Yanick Fratantonio
Abstract
In the context of mobile-based user-interface (UI) attacks, the common belief is that clickjacking is a solved problem. On the contrary, this paper shows that clickjacking is still an open problem for mobile devices. In fact, all known academic and industry solutions are either not effective or not applicable in the real-world for backward compatibility reasons. This work shows that, as a consequence, even popular and sensitive apps like Google Play Store remain, to date, completely unprotected from clickjacking attacks. After gathering insights into how apps use the user interface, this work performs a systematic exploration of the design space for an effective and practical protection against clickjacking attacks. We then use this exploration to guide the design of ClickShield, a new defensive mechanism. To address backward compatibility issues, our design allows for overlays to cover the screen, and we employ image analysis techniques to determine whether the user could be confused. We have implemented a prototype and we have tested it against ClickBench, a newly developed benchmark specifically tailored to stress-test clickjacking protection solutions. This dataset is constituted by 104 test cases, and it includes real-world and simulated benign and malicious examples that evaluate the system across a wide range of legitimate and attack scenarios. The results show that our system is able to address backward compatibility concerns, to detect all known attacks (including a never-seen-before real-world malware that was published after we have developed our solution), and it introduces a negligible overhead.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get f5c17187-ac5f-4269-8cfc-626ee533adccCited by top-tier papers9
- Demystifying Resource Management Risks in Emerging Mobile App-in-App EcosystemsHaoran Lu, Luyi Xing, Yue Xiao, Yifan Zhang et al.CCS 2020 · 48 citations
- Too Much Accessibility is Harmful! Automated Detection and Analysis of Overly Accessible Elements in Mobile AppsForough Mehralian, Navid Salehnamadi, Syed Fatiul Huq, Sam MalekASE 2022 · 19 citations
- Pixnapping: Bringing Pixel Stealing out of the Stone AgeAlan Wang, Pranav Gopalkrishnan, Yingchen Wang, Christopher W. Fletcher et al.CCS 2025 · 1 citation
- PHYjacking: Physical Input Hijacking for Zero-Permission Authorization Attacks on AndroidXianbo Wang, Shangcheng Shi, Yikang Chen, Wing Cheong LauNDSS 2022
- See No Evil: Phishing for Permissions with False TransparencyGüliz Seray Tuncay, Jingyu Qian, Carl A. GunterUSENIX Security 2020
Related papers
- Beyond the Surface: Uncovering the Unprotected Components of Android Against Overlay AttackHao Zhou, Shuohan Wu, Chenxiong Qian, Xiapu Luo et al.NDSS 2024
- Time Does Not Heal All Wounds: A Longitudinal Analysis of Security-Mechanism Support in Mobile BrowsersMeng Luo, Pierre Laperdrix, Nima Honarmand, Nick NikiforakisNDSS 2019 · 35 citations
- WindowGuard: Systematic Protection of GUI Security in AndroidChuangang Ren, Peng Liu, Sencun ZhuNDSS 2017 · 45 citations
- TapTrap: Animation-Driven Tapjacking on AndroidPhilipp Beer, Marco Squarcina, Sebastian Roth, Martina LindorferUSENIX Security 2025
- An Empirical Study of Web Resource Manipulation in Real-world Mobile ApplicationsXiaohan Zhang, Yuan Zhang, Qianqian Mo, Hao Xia et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 15 citations
