REAP: A Large-Scale Realistic Adversarial Patch Benchmark
Nabeel Hingun, Chawin Sitawarin, Jerry Li, David A. Wagner
Abstract
Machine learning models are known to be susceptible to adversarial perturbation. One famous attack is the adversarial patch, a particularly crafted sticker that makes the model mispredict the object it is placed on. This attack presents a critical threat to cyber-physical systems that rely on cameras such as autonomous cars. Despite the significance of the problem, conducting research in this setting has been difficult; evaluating attacks and defenses in the real world is exceptionally costly while synthetic data are unrealistic. In this work, we propose the REAP (REalistic Adversarial Patch) benchmark, a digital benchmark that enables the evaluations on real images under real-world conditions. Built on top of the Mapillary Vistas dataset, our benchmark contains over 14,000 traffic signs. Each sign is augmented with geometric and lighting transformations for applying a digitally generated patch realistically onto the sign. Using our benchmark, we perform the first large-scale assessments of adversarial patch attacks under realistic conditions. Our experiments suggest that patch attacks may present a smaller threat than previously believed and that the success rate of an attack on simpler digital simulations is not predictive of its actual effectiveness in practice. Our benchmark is released publicly at https://github.com/wagner-group/reap-benchmark.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f5a4d46f-d206-45fd-859d-b12d9be01497Cited by top-tier papers4
- Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial TrainingZekai Wang, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Min Lin et al.ICML 2023 · 300 citations
- Thermally Activated Dual-Modal Adversarial Clothing against AI Surveillance SystemsJiahuan Long, Tingsong Jiang, Hanqing Liu, Chao Ma et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- VisionGuard: Secure and Robust Visual Perception of Autonomous Vehicles in PracticeXingshuo Han, Haozhao Wang, Kangqiao Zhao, Gelei Deng et al.CCS 2024 · 3 citations
- Adversarial Patch EXterminator: Zero-Shot and Patch-Agnostic Defense Framework Against Adversarial Patch AttacksJiayimei Wang, Tao Ni, Guowen Xu, Qingchuan Zhao et al.USENIX Security 2026
Builds on14
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- A ConvNet for the 2020sZhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer et al.CVPR 2022 · 6,782 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object DetectionHao Zhang, Feng Li, Shilong Liu, Lei Zhang et al.ICLR 2023 · 753 citations
Related papers
- TPatch: A Triggered Physical Adversarial PatchWenjun Zhu, Xiaoyu Ji, Yushi Cheng, Shibo Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2023
- SLAP: Improving Physical Adversarial Examples with Short-Lived Adversarial PerturbationsGiulio Lovisotto, Henry Turner, Ivo Sluganovic, Martin Strohmeier et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 123 citations
- L-HAWK: A Controllable Physical Adversarial Patch Against a Long-Distance TargetTaifeng Liu, Yang Liu, Zhuo Ma, Tong Yang et al.NDSS 2025
- Fooling the Eyes of Autonomous Vehicles: Robust Physical Adversarial Examples Against Traffic Sign Recognition SystemsWei Jia, Zhaojun Lu, Haichun Zhang, Zhenglin Liu et al.NDSS 2022
- Invisible Reflections: Leveraging Infrared Laser Reflections to Target Traffic Sign PerceptionTakami Sato, Sri Hrushikesh Varma Bhupathiraju, Michael Clifford, Takeshi Sugawara et al.NDSS 2024
