Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Products
Andrew Wang, Elisa Nguyen, Runshi Yang, Juhan Bae, Sheila A. McIlraith, Roger Baker Grosse
Abstract
Training data attribution (TDA) provides insights into which training data is responsible for a learned model behavior. Gradient-based TDA methods such as influence functions and unrolled differentiation both involve a computation that resembles an inverse Hessian-vector product (iHVP), which is difficult to approximate efficiently. We introduce an algorithm (ASTRA) which uses the EKFAC-preconditioner on Neumann series iterations to arrive at an accurate iHVP approximation for TDA. ASTRA is easy to tune, requires fewer iterations than Neumann series iterations, and is more accurate than EKFAC-based approximations. Using ASTRA, we show that improving the accuracy of the iHVP approximation can significantly improve TDA performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f5451805-efe8-491b-95cc-ced388952cceCited by top-tier papers3
- Bayesian Influence Functions for Hessian-Free Data AttributionPhilipp Alexander Kreer, Wilson Wu, Maxwell Adam, Zach Furman et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Influence-Preserving Proxies for Gradient-Based Data Selection in LLM FineTuningSirui Chen, Yunzhe Qi, Mengting Ai, Yifan Sun et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- On the Fragility of Data Attribution When Learning Is DistributedXian Gao, Bo Hui, MIN-TE SUN, Wei-Shinn KuICML 2026
Builds on25
- Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of GeneralizationAndrew Gordon Wilson, Pavel IzmailovNeurIPS 2020 · 845 citations
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
- TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at ScaleSung Min Park, Kristian Georgiev, Andrew Ilyas, Guillaume Leclerc et al.ICML 2023 · 260 citations
- If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?Juhan Bae, Nathan Ng, Alston Lo, Marzyeh Ghassemi et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 185 citations
- Scaling Up Influence FunctionsAndrea Schioppa, Polina Zablotskaia, David Vilar, Artem SokolovAAAI 2022 · 149 citations
Related papers
- Training Data Attribution via Approximate UnrollingJuhan Bae, Wu Lin, Jonathan Lorraine, Roger B. GrosseNeurIPS 2024 · 41 citations
- Final-Model-Only Data Attribution with a Unifying View of Gradient-Based MethodsDennis Wei, Inkit Padhi, Soumya Ghosh, Amit Dhurandhar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Distributional Training Data Attribution: What do Influence Functions Sample?Bruno Kacper Mlodozeniec, Isaac Reid, Sam Power, David Krueger et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Influence Functions for Scalable Data Attribution in Diffusion ModelsBruno Kacper Mlodozeniec, Runa Eschenhagen, Juhan Bae, Alexander Immer et al.ICLR 2025
- Enhancing Training Data Attribution with Representational OptimizationWeiwei Sun, Haokun Liu, Nikhil Kandpal, Colin A. Raffel et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
