An SDE for Modeling SAM: Theory and Insights
Enea Monzio Compagnoni, Luca Biggio, Antonio Orvieto, Frank Norbert Proske, Hans Kersting, Aurélien Lucchi
Abstract
We study the SAM (Sharpness-Aware Minimization) optimizer which has recently attracted a lot of interest due to its increased performance over more classical variants of stochastic gradient descent. Our main contribution is the derivation of continuous-time models (in the form of SDEs) for SAM and two of its variants, both for the full-batch and mini-batch settings. We demonstrate that these SDEs are rigorous approximations of the real discrete-time algorithms (in a weak sense, scaling linearly with the learning rate). Using these models, we then offer an explanation of why SAM prefers flat minima over sharp ones -- by showing that it minimizes an implicitly regularized loss with a Hessian-dependent noise structure. Finally, we prove that SAM is attracted to saddle points under some realistic conditions. Our theoretical results are supported by detailed experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f5198b6b-9145-4783-afc6-9ddf14b5f689Cited by top-tier papers19
- The Crucial Role of Normalization in Sharpness-Aware MinimizationYan Dai, Kwangjun Ahn, Suvrit SraNeurIPS 2023 · 36 citations
- Practical Sharpness-Aware Minimization Cannot Converge All the Way to OptimaDongkuk Si, Chulhee YunNeurIPS 2023 · 34 citations
- Explicit Eigenvalue Regularization Improves Sharpness-Aware MinimizationHaocheng Luo, Tuan Truong, Tung Pham, Mehrtash Harandi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 28 citations
- Fundamental Convergence Analysis of Sharpness-Aware MinimizationPham Duy Khanh, Hoang-Chau Luong, Boris S. Mordukhovich, Dat Ba TranNeurIPS 2024 · 27 citations
- Stability Analysis of Sharpness-Aware MinimizationHoki Kim, Jinseong Park, Yujin Choi, Jaewook LeeICML 2026 · 18 citations
Builds on17
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find ThemYiding Jiang, Behnam Neyshabur, Hossein Mobahi, Dilip Krishnan et al.ICLR 2020 · 705 citations
- Towards Theoretically Understanding Why Sgd Generalizes Better Than Adam in Deep LearningPan Zhou, Jiashi Feng, Chao Ma, Caiming Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 309 citations
- Surrogate Gap Minimization Improves Sharpness-Aware TrainingJuntang Zhuang, Boqing Gong, Liangzhe Yuan, Yin Cui et al.ICLR 2022 · 213 citations
- Towards Understanding Sharpness-Aware MinimizationMaksym Andriushchenko, Nicolas FlammarionICML 2022 · 190 citations
Related papers
- On Saddle Point Avoidance and Stationary Distribution of Sharpness-Aware MinimizationTao Sun, Fan Jia, Bao WangKDD 2026 · 1 citation
- How Sharpness-Aware Minimization Minimizes Sharpness?Kaiyue Wen, Tengyu Ma, Zhiyuan LiICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- Sharpness-Aware Minimization Can Hallucinate MinimizersChanwoong Park, Uijeong Jang, Ernest Ryu, Insoon YangICML 2026
- Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization with a Polyak-type Step size: A Theory-Grounded SchedulerDimitris Oikonomou, Nicolas LoizouICML 2026
- Sharpness-Aware Minimization Efficiently Selects Flatter Minima Late In TrainingZhanpeng Zhou, Mingze Wang, Yuchen Mao, Bingrui Li et al.ICLR 2025
