WorldTravel: A Realistic Multimodal Travel-Planning Benchmark with Tightly Coupled Constraints
Zexuan Wang, Chenghao Yang, Yingqi Que, Zhoufutu Wen, Zaiyuan Wang, Jiashuo Liu, Zhixin Yao, Zhenzhu Yang, Huaqing Yuan, Yiwen Wang, Zhengxuan Jiang, Shengjie Fang
Abstract
Real-world autonomous planning requires coordinating tightly coupled constraints where a single decision dictates the feasibility of all subsequent actions. However, existing benchmarks predominantly feature loosely coupled constraints solvable through local greedy decisions and rely on idealized data, failing to capture constraint acquisition from realistic web interfaces. We introduce , a benchmark comprising 150 real-world travel scenarios across 5 cities, requiring agents to satisfy an average of 15+ interdependent temporal and logical constraints. To evaluate realistic deployment settings, we further develop , a multi-modal environment with over 2,000 rendered webpages that preserve layout-dependent and information-dense travel interfaces, requiring agents to recover executable constraints from rendered web interfaces. Evaluating 10 frontier models reveals a severe performance collapse: GPT-5.2 achieves only 28.0% feasibility in text-only settings, dropping to 3.4% in multi-modal environments. We observe substantial degradation in planning feasibility when agents must recover executable constraints from rendered webpages, alongside a Planning Horizon threshold at approximately 10 constraints where reasoning reliability collapses. These findings suggest that realistic constraint acquisition and long-horizon planning remain complementary bottlenecks for current agents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f504dd96-ab76-42f8-8ba0-11f0dc118bf0Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging FaceYongliang Shen, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Dongsheng Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,778 citations
- ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIsYujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,469 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Itinerary Planning - A Real-World Benchmark for Multi-Turn and Tool-Using Travel TasksXiang Cheng, Yulan Hu, Xiangwen Zhang, Lu Xu et al.ACL 2026 · 4 citations
- TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language AgentsJian Xie, Kai Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Tinghui Zhu et al.ICML 2024 · 376 citations
- DeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable ConstraintsYinger Zhang, Shutong Jiang, Renhao Li, Jianhong Tu et al.ACL 2026 · 21 citations
- LongCoT: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Chain-of-Thought ReasoningSumeet Motwani, Daniel Nichols, Charles London, Peggy Li et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- CostBench: Evaluating Multi-Turn Cost-Optimal Planning and Adaptation in Dynamic Environments for LLM Tool-Use AgentsJiayu Liu, Cheng Qian, Zhaochen Su, Qing Zong et al.ACL 2026 · 19 citations
