Rethinking Label Consistency of In-Context Learning: An Implicit Transductive Label Propagation Perspective
Haoyang Chen, Richong Zhang, Junfan Chen
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) perform in-context learning (ICL) with minimal supervised examples, which benefits various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. One of the critical research focus is the selection of prompt demonstrations. Current approaches typically employ retrieval models to select the top-K most semantically similar examples as demonstrations. However, we argue that existing methods are limited since the label consistency is not guaranteed during demonstration selection. Our cognition derives from the Bayesian view of ICL and our rethinking of ICL from the transductive label propagation perspective. We treat ICL as a transductive learning method and incorporate latent concepts from Bayesian view and deduce that similar demonstrations guide the concepts of query, with consistent labels serving as estimates. Based on this understanding, we establish a label propagation framework to link label consistency with propagation error bounds. To model label consistency, we propose a data synthesis method, leveraging both semantic and label information, and use TopK sampling with Synthetic Data (TopK-SD) to acquire demonstrations with consistent labels. TopK-SD outperforms original TopK sampling on multiple benchmarks. Our work provides a new perspective for understanding the working mechanisms within ICL.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f4c9ea8a-339b-40ed-9ab8-4cbd80d5628aBuilds on14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel et al.ACL 2022 · 1,494 citations
- An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian InferenceSang Michael Xie, Aditi Raghunathan, Percy Liang, Tengyu MaICLR 2022 · 1,030 citations
- Transformers Learn In-Context by Gradient DescentJohannes von Oswald, Eyvind Niklasson, Ettore Randazzo, João Sacramento et al.ICML 2023 · 729 citations
- A Survey on In-context LearningQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 479 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting Demonstration Selection Strategies in In-Context LearningKeqin Peng, Liang Ding, Yancheng Yuan, Xuebo Liu et al.ACL 2024
- Unraveling the Mechanics of Learning-Based Demonstration Selection for In-Context LearningHui Liu, Wenya Wang, Hao Sun, Chris Xing Tian et al.ACL 2025 · 13 citations
- What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task HypothesisJiaoda Li, Yifan Hou, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan CotterellACL 2024 · 5 citations
- Self-Instructed Derived Prompt Generation Meets In-Context Learning: Unlocking New Potential of Black-Box LLMsZhuo Li, Yuhao Du, Jinpeng Hu, Xiang Wan et al.ACL 2025
- Compositional Exemplars for In-context LearningJiacheng Ye, Zhiyong Wu, Jiangtao Feng, Tao Yu et al.ICML 2023 · 188 citations
