Stable Offline Value Function Learning with Bisimulation-based Representations
Brahma S. Pavse, Yudong Chen, Qiaomin Xie, Josiah P. Hanna
Abstract
In reinforcement learning, offline value function learning is the procedure of using an offline dataset to estimate the expected discounted return from each state when taking actions according to a fixed target policy. The stability of this procedure, i.e., whether it converges to its fixedpoint, critically depends on the representations of the state-action pairs. Poorly learned representations can make value function learning unstable, or even divergent. Therefore, it is critical to stabilize value function learning by explicitly shaping the state-action representations. Recently, the class of bisimulation-based algorithms have shown promise in shaping representations for control. However, it is still unclear if this class of methods can stabilize value function learning. In this work, we investigate this question and answer it affirmatively. We introduce a bisimulationbased algorithm called kernel representations for offline policy evaluation (KROPE). KROPE uses a kernel to shape state-action representations such that state-action pairs that have similar immediate rewards and lead to similar next state-action pairs under the target policy also have similar representations. We show that KROPE: 1) learns stable representations and 2) leads to lower value error than baselines. Our analysis provides new theoretical insight into the stability properties of bisimulationbased methods and suggests that practitioners can use these methods to improve the stability and accuracy of offline evaluation of reinforcement learning agents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f4bd95e0-75ee-49b8-ad5e-50767db0da50Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on31
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical PrecipiceRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,067 citations
- Scalable Methods for Computing State Similarity in Deterministic Markov Decision ProcessesPablo Samuel CastroAAAI 2020 · 171 citations
- Representation Learning for Online and Offline RL in Low-rank MDPsMasatoshi Uehara, Xuezhou Zhang, Wen SunICLR 2022 · 138 citations
- Representation Matters: Offline Pretraining for Sequential Decision MakingMengjiao Yang, Ofir NachumICML 2021 · 126 citations
Related papers
- Learning Bellman Complete Representations for Offline Policy EvaluationJonathan D. Chang, Kaiwen Wang, Nathan Kallus, Wen SunICML 2022 · 18 citations
- Representations for Stable Off-Policy Reinforcement LearningDibya Ghosh, Marc G. BellemareICML 2020 · 46 citations
- Behavior Prior Representation learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningHongyu Zang, Xin Li, Jie Yu, Chen Liu et al.ICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- Towards Robust Bisimulation Metric LearningMete Kemertas, Tristan Aumentado-ArmstrongNeurIPS 2021 · 68 citations
- Understanding and Addressing the Pitfalls of Bisimulation-based Representations in Offline Reinforcement LearningHongyu Zang, Xin Li, Leiji Zhang, Yang Liu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
