Finding Bugs in MLIR Compiler Infrastructure via Lowering Space Exploration
Jingjing Liang, Shan Huang, Ting Su
Abstract
MLIR is a widely adopted compiler infrastructure that supports multi-level IRs and reusable components. Ensuring its correctness is critical, as bugs can propagate to downstream systems. MLIR provides a lowering mechanism that transforms high-level programs into low-level representations through configurable sequences of passes, and allows multiple valid lowering paths for a given program. This gives rise to a lowering equivalence property: all valid lowering paths for the same MLIR program should produce semantically equivalent results. In this paper, we leverage this property and propose lowering space exploration, to effectively test the MLIR infrastructure. Our approach dynamically constructs diverse lowering paths in an adaptive, stepwise manner using a feedback-based scheduling mechanism. It finds bugs by comparing the execution results across these paths. Any inconsistencies indicate potential bugs in the MLIR infrastructure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to test MLIR from the perspective of exploring its compilation space. We implement our approach in a tool named LOBE and evaluate it on latest MLIR versions. LOBE discovers 38 previously unknown bugs, including 8 miscompilations and 30 crash bugs, with 25 confirmed/fixed.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f47a72d2-122a-454e-9e6d-8774307039e4Builds on14
- Random testing for C and C++ compilers with YARPGenVsevolod Livinskii, Dmitry Babokin, John RegehrOOPSLA 2020 · 140 citations
- NNSmith: Generating Diverse and Valid Test Cases for Deep Learning CompilersJiawei Liu, Jinkun Lin, Fabian Ruffy, Cheng Tan et al.ASPLOS 2023 · 90 citations
- Automated conformance testing for JavaScript engines via deep compiler fuzzingGuixin Ye, Zhanyong Tang, Shin Hwei Tan, Songfang Huang et al.PLDI 2021 · 75 citations
- Who's debugging the debuggers? exposing debug information bugs in optimized binariesGiuseppe Antonio Di Luna, Davide Italiano, Luca Massarelli, Sebastian Österlund et al.ASPLOS 2021 · 32 citations
- Debug information validation for optimized codeYuanbo Li, Shuo Ding, Qirun Zhang, Davide ItalianoPLDI 2020 · 30 citations
Related papers
- MLIRSmith: Random Program Generation for Fuzzing MLIR Compiler InfrastructureHaoyu Wang, Junjie Chen, Chuyue Xie, Shuang Liu et al.ASE 2023 · 16 citations
- Directed Testing in MLIR: Unleashing Its Potential by Overcoming the Limitations of Random FuzzingWeiyuan Tong, Zixu Wang, Zhanyong Tang, Jianbin Fang et al.FSE 2025 · 1 citation
- Fuzzing MLIR Compiler Infrastructure via Operation Dependency AnalysisChenyao Suo, Junjie Chen, Shuang Liu, Jiajun Jiang et al.ISSTA 2024 · 12 citations
- Interleaved Learning and Exploration: A Self-Adaptive Fuzz Testing Framework for MLIRZeyu Sun, Jingjing Liang, Weiyi Wang, Chenyao Suo et al.ASE 2025 · 1 citation
- DESIL: Detecting Silent Bugs in MLIR Compiler InfrastructureChenyao Suo, Jianrong Wang, Yongjia Wang, Jiajun Jiang et al.OOPSLA 2025 · 2 citations
