Exclusion Zones of Instant Runoff Voting
Kiran Tomlinson, Johan Ugander, Jon M. Kleinberg
Abstract
Recent research on instant runoff voting (IRV) shows that it exhibits a striking combinatorial property in one-dimensional preference spaces: there is an exclusion zone around the median voter such that if a candidate from the exclusion zone is on the ballot, then the winner must come from the exclusion zone. Thus, in one dimension, IRV cannot elect an extreme candidate as long as a sufficiently moderate candidate is running. In this work, we examine the mathematical structure of exclusion zones as a broad phenomenon in more general preference spaces. We prove that with voters uniformly distributed over any d-dimensional hyperrectangle (for d > 1), IRV has no nontrivial exclusion zone. However, we also show that IRV exclusion zones are not solely a one-dimensional phenomenon. For irregular higher-dimensional preference spaces with fewer symmetries than hyperrectangles, IRV can exhibit nontrivial exclusion zones. As a further exploration, we study IRV exclusion zones in graph voting, where nodes represent voters who prefer candidates closer to them in the graph. Here, we show that IRV exclusion zones present a surprising computational challenge: even checking whether a given set of positions is an IRV exclusion zone is NP-hard. We develop an efficient randomized approximation algorithm for checking and finding exclusion zones. We also report on computational experiments with exclusion zones in two directions: (i) applying our approximation algorithm to a collection of real-world school friendship networks, we find that about 60% of these networks have probable nontrivial IRV exclusion zones; and (ii) performing an exhaustive computer search of small graphs and trees, we also find nontrivial IRV exclusion zones in most graphs. While our focus is on IRV, the properties of exclusion zones we establish provide a novel method for analyzing voting systems in metric spaces more generally.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f4732732-0d18-46aa-b197-6af3acfe07fcBuilds on4
- Resolving the Optimal Metric Distortion ConjectureVasilis Gkatzelis, Daniel Halpern, Nisarg ShahFOCS 2020 · 44 citations
- Dimensionality and Coordination in Voting: The Distortion of STVIoannis Anagnostides, Dimitris Fotakis, Panagiotis PatsilinakosAAAI 2022 · 7 citations
- The Moderating Effect of Instant Runoff VotingKiran Tomlinson, Johan Ugander, Jon M. KleinbergAAAI 2024 · 4 citations
- Six Candidates Suffice to Win a Voter MajorityMoses Charikar, Alexandra Lassota, Prasanna Ramakrishnan, Adrian Vetta et al.STOC 2025 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Spatial Voting with Incomplete Voter InformationAviram Imber, Jonas Israel, Markus Brill, Hadas Shachnai et al.AAAI 2024 · 6 citations
- Promoting Fairness and Priority in Selecting k-Winners Using IRVMd Mouinul Islam, Soroush Vahidi, Baruch Schieber, Senjuti Basu RoyKDD 2024 · 2 citations
- Ballot Length in Instant Runoff VotingKiran Tomlinson, Johan Ugander, Jon M. KleinbergAAAI 2023 · 15 citations
- Favorite-Candidate Voting for Eliminating the Least Popular Candidate in a Metric SpaceXujin Chen, Minming Li, Chenhao WangAAAI 2020 · 16 citations
- Properties of Position Matrices and Their ElectionsNiclas Boehmer, Jin-Yi Cai, Piotr Faliszewski, Austen Z. Fan et al.AAAI 2023 · 7 citations
