Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

Fine-tuning LLMs with Cross-Attention-based Weight Decay for Bias Mitigation

Farsheed Haque, Zhe Fu, Depeng Xu, Shuhan Yuan, Xi Niu

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks but often propagate societal biases from their training data, leading to discriminatory outputs. These biases are amplified by the models' selfattention mechanisms, which disproportionately emphasize biased correlations with sensitive tokens, like "he" or "she", reflecting the sensitive attributes such as gender and race. To address this issue, we propose a novel finetuning method, called Cross-Attention-based Weight Decay (CrAWD), which modifies the LLM architecture to mitigate bias. CrAWD introduces a cross-attention mechanism between an input sequence and a sensitive token sequence, enabling the model to identify and selectively decay the attention weights of tokens associated with sensitive tokens. This reduces the influence of biased association on the model's generation while maintaining task performance. Evaluations on real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed CrAWD method. Notably, our method can handle multiple sensitive attributes by adjusting the sensitive token sequence, and it does not require full knowledge of sensitive tokens presented in the dataset, underscoring CrAWD's versatility in promoting fair LLMs across various applications.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers1

  1. Identity-Robust Language Model Generation via Content Integrity PreservationMiao Zhang, Kelly Chen, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Rumi ChunaraACL 2026 · 1 citation

Builds on9

  1. QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
  2. "Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference LettersYixin Wan, George Pu, Jiao Sun, Aparna Garimella et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 139 citations
  3. Fairness-guided Few-shot Prompting for Large Language ModelsHuan Ma, Changqing Zhang, Yatao Bian, Lemao Liu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 87 citations
  4. CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language ModelsNikita Nangia, Clara Vania, Rasika Bhalerao, Samuel R. BowmanEMNLP 2020 · 19 citations
  5. "Thinking" Fair and Slow: On the Efficacy of Structured Prompts for Debiasing Language ModelsShaz Furniturewala, Surgan Jandial, Abhinav Java, Pragyan Banerjee et al.EMNLP 2024 · 14 citations

Related papers

  1. Multi-Feature Quantized Self-Attention for Fair Large Language ModelsJaeil Park, Sung-Bae ChoICLR 2026
  2. KLAAD: Refining Attention Mechanisms to Reduce Societal Bias in Generative Language ModelsSeorin Kim, Dongyoung Lee, Jaejin LeeEMNLP 2025
  3. Toward Inclusive Language Models: Sparsity-Driven Calibration for Systematic and Interpretable Mitigation of Social Biases in LLMsPrommy Sultana Hossain, Chahat Raj, Ziwei Zhu, Jessica Lin et al.EMNLP Findings 2025
  4. Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models via Counterfactual EvaluationPo-Sen Huang, Huan Zhang, Ray Jiang, Robert Stanforth et al.EMNLP Findings 2020 · 124 citations
  5. Bias Analysis and Mitigation through Protected Attribute Detection and Regard ClassificationTakuma Udagawa, Yang Zhao, Hiroshi Kanayama, Bishwaranjan BhattacharjeeEMNLP Findings 2025
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines