Speculative Safety-Aware Decoding
Xuekang Wang, Shengyu Zhu, Xueqi Cheng
Abstract
Despite extensive efforts to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human values and safety rules, jailbreak attacks that exploit certain vulnerabilities continuously emerge, highlighting the need to strengthen existing LLMs with additional safety properties to defend against these attacks. However, tuning large models has become increasingly resourceintensive and may have difficulty ensuring consistent performance. We introduce Speculative Safety-Aware Decoding (SSD), a lightweight decoding-time approach that equips LLMs with the desired safety property while accelerating inference. We assume that there exists a small language model that possesses this desired property. SSD integrates speculative sampling during decoding and leverages the match ratio between the small and composite models to quantify jailbreak risks. This enables SSD to dynamically switch between decoding schemes to prioritize utility or safety, to handle the challenge of different model capacities. The output token is then sampled from a new distribution that combines the distributions of the original and the small models. Experimental results show that SSD successfully equips the large model with the desired safety property, and also allows the model to remain helpful to benign queries. Furthermore, SSD accelerates the inference time, thanks to the speculative sampling design.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f441ed71-e8eb-47b0-81cd-a0f4f1fd93f0Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on19
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative DecodingYaniv Leviathan, Matan Kalman, Yossi MatiasICML 2023 · 1,472 citations
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,104 citations
Related papers
- SafeSpec: Fast and Safe LLM via Dynamic Reflective SamplingHAOTIAN XU, Zeyang Zhang, Linbao Li, Huadi Zheng et al.ICML 2026
- Root Defense Strategies: Ensuring Safety of LLM at the Decoding LevelXinyi Zeng, Yuying Shang, Jiawei Chen, Jingyuan Zhang et al.ACL 2025 · 6 citations
- Alignment-Enhanced Decoding: Defending Jailbreaks via Token-Level Adaptive Refining of Probability DistributionsQuan Liu, Zhenhong Zhou, Longzhu He, Yi Liu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware DecodingZhangchen Xu, Fengqing Jiang, Luyao Niu, Jinyuan Jia et al.ACL 2024
- Jailbreak Antidote: Runtime Safety-Utility Balance via Sparse Representation Adjustment in Large Language ModelsGuobin Shen, Dongcheng Zhao, Yiting Dong, Xiang He et al.ICLR 2025
