Optimal Phylogenetic Reconstruction from Sampled Quartets
Dionysis Arvanitakis, Vaggos Chatziafratis, Yiyuan Luo, Konstantin Makarychev
Abstract
Quartet Reconstruction, the task of recovering a single phylogenetic tree from smaller trees on four species called quartets, is a well-studied problem in theoretical computer science with farreaching connections to statistics, graph theory and biology. Given a random sample containing m noisy quartets, labeled according to an unknown ground-truth tree T on n taxa, we want to learn the tree structure of T with small generalization error, i.e., to output a tree T that is close to T in terms of quartet distance and can predict the classification of unseen quartets. Unfortunately, the empirical risk minimizer corresponds to the NP-hard problem of finding a tree that maximizes agreements with the sampled quartets, and earlier works in approximation algorithms gave (1 -ϵ)-approximation schemes (PTAS) for dense instances with m = Θ(n 4 ) quartets, or for m = Θ(n 2 log n) quartets randomly sampled from T .
Prior to our work, it was unknown how many samples are information-theoretically required to learn the tree, and whether there is an efficient reconstruction algorithm. We present optimal results for reconstructing an unknown phylogenetic tree T from a random sample of m = Θ(n) quartets, potentially corrupted under the standard Random Classification Noise (RCN) model. This matches the Ω(n) lower bound required for any meaningful tree reconstruction, as for m = o(n), large parts of T cannot be recovered, and exact tree reconstruction (ϵ = 0) requires Ω(n 3 ) quartets. Our contribution is twofold: first, we give a tree reconstruction algorithm that, not only achieves a (1 -ϵ)-approximation for Quartet Reconstruction, but most importantly recovers a tree close to T in quartet distance; second, we show a new Θ(n) bound on the Natarajan dimension of phylogenies (an analog of VC dimension in multiclass classification), which may be of independent interest. Coupled together, these imply that our reconstructed tree T will generalize well to unseen quartets. Our analysis relies on a new Quartet-based Embedding and Detection (QED) procedure, that repeatedly identifies and removes well-clustered subtrees from the (unknown) ground-truth T via semidefinite programming.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on6
- Optimal Sample Complexity of Contrastive LearningNoga Alon, Dmitrii Avdiukhin, Dor Elboim, Orr Fischer et al.ICLR 2024 · 15 citations
- Fitting Distances by Tree Metrics Minimizing the Total Error within a Constant FactorVincent Cohen-Addad, Debarati Das, Evangelos Kipouridis, Nikos Parotsidis et al.FOCS 2021 · 5 citations
- Fitting Metrics and Ultrametrics with Minimum DisagreementsVincent Cohen-Addad, Chenglin Fan, Euiwoong Lee, Arnaud de MesmayFOCS 2022 · 3 citations
- Triplet Reconstruction and all other Phylogenetic CSPs are Approximation ResistantVaggos Chatziafratis, Konstantin MakarychevFOCS 2023 · 2 citations
- Tree Learning: Optimal Sample Complexity and AlgorithmsDmitrii Avdiukhin, Grigory Yaroslavtsev, Danny Vainstein, Orr Fischer et al.AAAI 2023 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Planar and Minor-Free Metrics Embed into Metrics of Polylogarithmic Treewidth with Expected Multiplicative Distortion Arbitrarily Close to 1Vincent Cohen-Addad, Hung Le, Marcin Pilipczuk, Michal PilipczukFOCS 2023 · 5 citations
- Near-Optimal Average-Case Approximate Trace Reconstruction from Few TracesXi Chen, Anindya De, Chin Ho Lee, Rocco A. Servedio et al.SODA 2022 · 7 citations
- Lattice partition recovery with dyadic CARTOscar Hernan Madrid Padilla, Yi Yu, Alessandro RinaldoNeurIPS 2021 · 8 citations
- A Generalized Trace Reconstruction Problem: Recovering a String of ProbabilitiesJoey Rivkin, Gregory Valiant, Paul ValiantSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- SGA: A Robust Algorithm for Partial Recovery of Tree-Structured Graphical Models with Noisy SamplesAnshoo Tandon, Aldric H. J. Han, Vincent Y. F. TanICML 2021 · 10 citations
