GenderMag Improves Discoverability in the Field, Especially for Women: An Multi-Year Case Study of Suggest Edit, a Code Review Feature
Emerson R. Murphy-Hill, Alberto Elizondo, Ambar Murillo, Marian Harbach, Bogdan Vasilescu, Delphine Carlson, Florian Dessloch
Abstract
Prior research shows that the GenderMag method can help identify and address usability barriers that are more likely to affect women software users than men. However, the evidence for the effectiveness of GenderMag is limited to small lab studies. In this case study, by combining self-reported gender data from tens of thousands of users of an internal code review tool with software logs data gathered over a five-year period, we quantitatively show that GenderMag helped a team at Google (a) correctly identify discoverability as a usability barrier more likely to affect women than men, and (b) increase discoverability by 2.4x while also achieving gender parity. That is, compared to men using the original code review tool, women and men using the system redesigned with GenderMag were both 2.4x more likely to discover the "Suggest Edit" feature at any given time. Thus, this paper contributes the first large-scale evidence of the effectiveness of GenderMag in the field.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f42a466a-58f5-4ee4-8f97-b00455d8cd4aCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- A Literature Review of Quantitative Persona CreationJoni Salminen, Kathleen W. Guan, Soon-Gyo Jung, Shammur A. Chowdhury et al.CHI 2020 · 119 citations
- Engineering gender-inclusivity into software: ten teams' tales from the trenchesClaudia Hilderbrand, Christopher Perdriau, Lara Letaw, Jillian Emard et al.ICSE 2020 · 32 citations
- AID: An automated detector for gender-inclusivity bugs in OSS project pagesAmreeta Chatterjee, Mariam Guizani, Catherine Stevens, Jillian Emard et al.ICSE 2021 · 22 citations
- Systemic Gender Inequities in Who Reviews CodeEmerson R. Murphy-Hill, Jillian Dicker, Amber Horvath, Margaret Morrow Hodges et al.CSCW 2023 · 6 citations
Related papers
- Biases and differences in code review using medical imaging and eye-tracking: genders, humans, and machinesYu Huang, Kevin Leach, Zohreh Sharafi, Nicholas McKay et al.FSE 2020 · 37 citations
- Diagnosing Bias in the Gender Representation of HCI Research Participants: How it Happens and Where We AreAnna Offenwanger, Alan John Milligan, Minsuk Chang, Julia Bullard et al.CHI 2021 · 51 citations
- Building and Sustaining Ethnically, Racially, and Gender Diverse Software Engineering Teams: A Study at GoogleElla Dagan, Anita Sarma, Alison Chang, Sarah D'Angelo et al.FSE 2023 · 22 citations
- Gender Differences in Graphic Design Q&As: How Community and Site Characteristics Contribute to Gender Gaps in Answering QuestionsPatrick Marcel Joseph Dubois, Mahya Maftouni, Parmit K. Chilana, Joanna McGrenere et al.CSCW 2020 · 16 citations
- Destructive Criticism in Software Code Review Impacts InclusionSanuri Dananja Gunawardena, Peter Devine, Isabelle Beaumont, Lola Piper Garden et al.CSCW 2022 · 27 citations
