Near-Optimal Time-Sparsity Trade-Offs for Solving Noisy Linear Equations
Kiril Bangachev, Guy Bresler, Stefan Tiegel, Vinod Vaikuntanathan
Abstract
We present a polynomial-time reduction from solving noisy linear equations over ℤ/ ℤ in dimension Θ( log /poly(log , log , log log )) with a uniformly random coefficient matrix to noisy linear equations over ℤ/ ℤ in dimension where each row of the coefficient matrix has uniformly random support of size . is allows us to deduce the hardness of sparse problems from their dense counterparts. In particular, we derive hardness results in the following canonical se ings: 1. Assuming the -dimensional (dense) learning with errors (LWE) problem over a polynomial-size field takes time 2 Ω( ) , -sparse LWE in dimension takes time 2. Assuming the -dimensional (dense) learning parity with noise (LPN) problem over 2 takes time 2 Ω( / log ) , -sparse LPN in dimension takes time Ω( /(log ⋅(log +log log ) 2 )) . ese running time lower bounds are nearly tight as both sparse problems can be solved in time ( ) , given sufficiently many samples. Our reduction allows us to derive several consequences in cryptography and the computational complexity of statistical problems. In addition, as a new application, we give a reduction from -sparse LWE to noisy tensor completion. Concretely, composing the two reductions implies that order-rank-2 -1 noisy tensor completion in ℝ ⊗ takes time Ω( / log ⋅(log +log log )) , assuming the exponential hardness of standard worst-case la ice problems. Our reduction is (nearly) lossless and extremely versatile: it preserves the number of samples up to a 1-(1) multiplicative factor with high probability and it preserves the noise distribution. In particular, it also applies to the learning with rounding problem. e same reduction works for a wide range of ring sizes from = 2 to that is super-polynomial in the initial dimension and for varying support sizes between samples. Finally, our reduction is compatible with decision (testing), search, and strong refutation and, hence, reduces hardness in the sparse se ing to that of the standard, dense, se ing for all three tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f41b849b-4f65-4ece-b57f-5767500e8ff0Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Indistinguishability obfuscation from well-founded assumptionsAayush Jain, Huijia Lin, Amit SahaiSTOC 2021 · 223 citations
- Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational LimitBoaz Barak, Benjamin L. Edelman, Surbhi Goel, Sham M. Kakade et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 220 citations
- Near-Optimal Cryptographic Hardness of Agnostically Learning Halfspaces and ReLU Regression under Gaussian MarginalsIlias Diakonikolas, Daniel Kane, Lisheng RenICML 2023 · 40 citations
- On the Cryptographic Hardness of Learning Single Periodic NeuronsMin Jae Song, Ilias Zadik, Joan BrunaNeurIPS 2021 · 39 citations
- Hardness of LWE on General Entropic DistributionsZvika Brakerski, Nico DöttlingEUROCRYPT 2020 · 36 citations
Related papers
- A Systematic Study of Sparse LWEAayush Jain, Huijia Lin, Sagnik SahaCRYPTO 2024 · 8 citations
- Continuous LWE is as Hard as LWE & Applications to Learning Gaussian MixturesAparna Gupte, Neekon Vafa, Vinod VaikuntanathanFOCS 2022 · 15 citations
- Smoothing Out Binary Linear Codes and Worst-Case Sub-exponential Hardness for LPNYu Yu, Jiang ZhangCRYPTO 2021 · 11 citations
- The Hardness of LPN over Any Integer Ring and Field for PCG ApplicationsHanlin Liu, Xiao Wang, Kang Yang, Yu YuEUROCRYPT 2024 · 21 citations
- Sample Efficient Search to Decision for kLINAndrej Bogdanov, Alon Rosen, Kel Zin TanCRYPTO 2025 · 2 citations
