Facing LLMs: Robot Communication Styles in Mediating Health Information between Parents and Young Adults
Joel Wester, Bhakti Moghe, Katie Winkle, Niels van Berkel
Abstract
Fig. 1. Opening phrases across four Robot Communication Styles (RCS). C1: Human-scripted, C2: Humorous, C3: Self-deprecating, C4: Persuasive. Robot utterances as played to participants in vignettes.
Young adults may feel embarrassed when disclosing sensitive information to their parents, while parents might similarly avoid sharing sensitive aspects of their lives with their children. How to design interactive interventions that are sensitive to the needs of both younger and older family members in mediating sensitive information remains an open question. In this paper, we explore the integration of large language models (LLMs) with social robots. Specifically, we use GPT-4 to adapt different Robot Communication Styles (RCS) for a social robot mediator designed to elicit self-disclosure and mediate health information between parents and young adults living apart. We design and compare four literature-informed RCS: three LLM-adapted (Humorous, Self-deprecating, and Persuasive) and one manually created (Human-scripted), and assess participant perceptions of Likeability, Usefulness, Helpfulness, Relatedness, and Interpersonal Closeness. Through an online experiment with 183 participants, we assess the RCS across two groups: adults with children (Parents) and young adults without children (Young Adults). Our results indicate that both Parents and Young Adults favoured the Human-scripted and Self-deprecating RCS as compared to the other two RCS. The Self-deprecating RCS furthermore led to increased relatedness as compared to the Humorous RCS. Our qualitative findings reveal challenges people have in disclosing health information to family members, and who normally assumes the role of family facilitator-two areas in which social robots can play a key role. The findings offer insights for integrating LLMs with social robots in health-mediation and other contexts involving the sharing of sensitive information.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Objection Overruled! Lay People can Distinguish Large Language Models from Lawyers, but still Favour Advice from an LLMEike Schneiders, Tina Seabrooke, Joshua Krook, Richard Hyde et al.CHI 2025 · 15 citations
- How Do We Research Human-Robot Interaction in the Age of Large Language Models? A Systematic ReviewYufeng Wang, Yuan Xu, Anastasia Nikolova, Yuxuan Wang et al.CHI 2026 · 4 citations
- Chaplains' Reflections on the Design and Usage of AI for Conversational CareJoel Wester, Samuel Rhys Cox, Henning Pohl, Niels van BerkelCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Polite But Boring? Trade-offs Between Engagement and Psychological Reactance to Chatbot Feedback StylesSamuel Rhys Cox, Joel Wester, Niels van BerkelCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Sharing Women's Health Experiences Influenced by Genetic Factors: Practices, Challenges, and OpportunitiesZiqi Yang, Daniel A. Epstein, Yunan ChenCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on9
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
- "I Hear You, I Feel You": Encouraging Deep Self-disclosure through a ChatbotYi-Chieh Lee, Naomi Yamashita, Yun Huang, Wai FuCHI 2020 · 333 citations
- Understanding the Benefits and Challenges of Deploying Conversational AI Leveraging Large Language Models for Public Health InterventionEunkyung Jo, Daniel A. Epstein, Hyunhoon Jung, Young-Ho KimCHI 2023 · 167 citations
- Capable but Amoral? Comparing AI and Human Expert Collaboration in Ethical Decision MakingSuzanne Tolmeijer, Markus Christen, Serhiy Kandul, Markus Kneer et al.CHI 2022 · 68 citations
- One AI Does Not Fit All: A Cluster Analysis of the Laypeople's Perception of AI RolesTaenyun Kim, Maria D. Molina, Minjin Rheu, Emily Shuo Zhan et al.CHI 2023 · 67 citations
Related papers
- "It's the only thing I can trust": Envisioning Large Language Model Use by Autistic Workers for Communication AssistanceJiWoong Jang, Sanika Moharana, Patrick Carrington, Andrew BegelCHI 2024 · 58 citations
- Exploring the Effects of Different Chatbot Voice Identities on Self-DisclosureYamato Mogi, Wataru Akahori, Naomi YamashitaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Interface Matters: Exploring Human Trust in Health Information from Large Language Models via Text, Speech, and EmbodimentXin Sun, Yunjie Liu, Jos A. Bosch, Zhuying LiCSCW 2025 · 9 citations
- Towards Better Health Conversations: The Benefits of Context-seekingRory Sayres, Yuexing Hao, Abbi Ward, Amy Wang et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Understanding Parents' Desires in Moderating Children's Interactions with GenAI Chatbots through LLM-Generated ProbesJohn Driscoll, Yulin Chen, Viki Shi, Izak Vucharatavintara et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
