HIT: Solving Partial Index Tracking via Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
Zetao Zheng, Jie Shao, Feiyu Chen, Anjie Zhu, Shilong Deng, Heng Tao Shen
Abstract
Partial index tracking (PIT) is a popular passive investment strategy aiming at replicating the performance of a market index (e.g., S&P 500). Existing PIT methods typically treat it as a regression problem and divide it into two tasks: (i) asset selection (determining which assets to choose from the index constituents) and (ii) asset allocation (deciding how to allocate capital among the selected assets). However, these methods either optimize these two tasks jointly, which has been proven to be NP-hard and inefficient when tracking large-scale constituent indices (e.g., Russell 2000), or attempt an independent optimization, lacking a connection to ensure collaborative optimization. In this paper, we present a hierarchical model for partial index tracking (HIT), which formulates PIT as a hierarchical Markov decision process (MDP) and is optimized via hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL). HIT consists of (1) a high-level policy learns to select assets from constituents to handle task (i) and (2) a low-level policy learns to allocate capital weights among the selected assets to handle task (ii). We further propose a novel cost-sensitive reward function that serves as a connection to collaboratively optimize the two policies, aiming to replicate the index closely while considering transaction cost. Compared with existing jointly optimized approaches, our model simplifies the problem by learning separate policies for the two tasks, and the reward function serves as a connection to ensure collaborative optimization between them, avoiding challenges faced by joint optimization methods in existing literature. Remarkable performance across 6 benchmarks, ranging from small to large-scale constituents demonstrate the superiority of HIT. Moreover, the experiments conducted on a real-world market dataset spanning over 10 years show its effectiveness and practicality.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Related papers
- Index Tracking with Cardinality Constraints: A Stochastic Neural Networks ApproachYu Zheng, Bowei Chen, Timothy M. Hospedales, Yongxin YangAAAI 2020 · 22 citations
- Commission Fee is not Enough: A Hierarchical Reinforced Framework for Portfolio ManagementRundong Wang, Hongxin Wei, Bo An, Zhouyan Feng et al.AAAI 2021 · 50 citations
- DCC: Differentiable Cardinality Constraints for Partial Index TrackingWooyeon Jo, Hyunsouk ChoAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Reinforcement Learning with Maskable Stock Representation for Portfolio Management in Customizable Stock PoolsWentao Zhang, Yilei Zhao, Shuo Sun, Jie Ying et al.WWW 2024 · 18 citations
- Budget-aware Index Tuning with Reinforcement LearningWentao Wu, Chi Wang, Tarique Siddiqui, Junxiong Wang et al.SIGMOD 2022 · 33 citations
