Bias Mitigation in Machine Translation Quality Estimation
Hanna Behnke, Marina Fomicheva, Lucia Specia
Abstract
Machine Translation Quality Estimation (QE) aims to build predictive models to assess the quality of machine-generated translations in the absence of reference translations. While state-of-the-art QE models have been shown to achieve good results, they over-rely on features that do not have a causal impact on the quality of a translation. In particular, there appears to be a partial input bias, i.e., a tendency to assign high-quality scores to translations that are fluent and grammatically correct, even though they do not preserve the meaning of the source. We analyse the partial input bias in further detail and evaluate four approaches to use auxiliary tasks for bias mitigation. Two approaches use additional data to inform and support the main task, while the other two are adversarial, actively discouraging the model from learning the bias. We compare the methods with respect to their ability to reduce the partial input bias while maintaining the overall performance. We find that training a multitask architecture with an auxiliary binary classification task that utilises additional augmented data best achieves the desired effects and generalises well to different languages and quality metrics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f3926a70-e5cc-4d37-9ac0-e2667c03c2c5Cited by top-tier papers3
- Prompt as Triggers for Backdoor Attack: Examining the Vulnerability in Language ModelsShuai Zhao, Jinming Wen, Anh Tuan Luu, Junbo Zhao et al.EMNLP 2023 · 39 citations
- Improving Translation Quality Estimation with Bias MitigationHui Huang, Shuangzhi Wu, Kehai Chen, Hui Di et al.ACL 2023 · 2 citations
- FairQE: Multi-Agent Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias in Translation Quality EstimationJinhee Jang, Juhwan Choi, Dongjin Lee, Seunguk Yu et al.ACL 2026
Builds on3
- Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at ScaleAlexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary et al.ACL 2020 · 539 citations
- End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in CorporaRabeeh Karimi Mahabadi, Yonatan Belinkov, James HendersonACL 2020 · 136 citations
- Avoiding the Hypothesis-Only Bias in Natural Language Inference via Ensemble Adversarial TrainingJoe Stacey, Pasquale Minervini, Haim Dubossarsky, Sebastian Riedel et al.EMNLP 2020 · 6 citations
Related papers
- DirectQE: Direct Pretraining for Machine Translation Quality EstimationQu Cui, Shujian Huang, Jiahuan Li, Xiang Geng et al.AAAI 2021 · 24 citations
- Translationese as a Language in "Multilingual" NMTParker Riley, Isaac Caswell, Markus Freitag, David GrangierACL 2020
- PreQuEL: Quality Estimation of Machine Translation Outputs in AdvanceShachar Don-Yehiya, Leshem Choshen, Omri AbendEMNLP 2022 · 4 citations
- Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation in Many Languages via Zero-Shot ParaphrasingBrian Thompson, Matt PostEMNLP 2020 · 7 citations
- Investigating the Helpfulness of Word-Level Quality Estimation for Post-Editing Machine Translation OutputRaksha Shenoy, Nico Herbig, Antonio Krüger, Josef van GenabithEMNLP 2021 · 3 citations
