Hold me tight! Influence of discriminative features on deep network boundaries
Guillermo Ortiz-Jiménez, Apostolos Modas, Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-Dezfooli, Pascal Frossard
Abstract
Important insights towards the explainability of neural networks reside in the characteristics of their decision boundaries. In this work, we borrow tools from the field of adversarial robustness, and propose a new perspective that relates dataset features to the distance of samples to the decision boundary. This enables us to carefully tweak the position of the training samples and measure the induced changes on the boundaries of CNNs trained on large-scale vision datasets. We use this framework to reveal some intriguing properties of CNNs. Specifically, we rigorously confirm that neural networks exhibit a high invariance to non-discriminative features, and show that the decision boundaries of a DNN can only exist as long as the classifier is trained with some features that hold them together. Finally, we show that the construction of the decision boundary is extremely sensitive to small perturbations of the training samples, and that changes in certain directions can lead to sudden invariances in the orthogonal ones. This is precisely the mechanism that adversarial training uses to achieve robustness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f2dfa154-313c-4558-a0f5-011599747bddCited by top-tier papers9
- The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural NetworksHarshay Shah, Kaustav Tamuly, Aditi Raghunathan, Prateek Jain et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 503 citations
- Vision Transformers Are Robust LearnersSayak Paul, Pin-Yu ChenAAAI 2022 · 372 citations
- Spectral Bias in Practice: The Role of Function Frequency in GeneralizationSara Fridovich-Keil, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Rebecca RoelofsNeurIPS 2022 · 61 citations
- Neural Anisotropy DirectionsGuillermo Ortiz-Jiménez, Apostolos Modas, Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-Dezfooli, Pascal FrossardNeurIPS 2020 · 21 citations
- Revealing the Dark Secrets of Extremely Large Kernel ConvNets on RobustnessHonghao Chen, Yurong Zhang, Xiaokun Feng, Xiangxiang Chu et al.ICML 2024 · 11 citations
Builds on5
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural NetworksHarshay Shah, Kaustav Tamuly, Aditi Raghunathan, Prateek Jain et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 503 citations
- When Do Neural Networks Outperform Kernel Methods?Behrooz Ghorbani, Song Mei, Theodor Misiakiewicz, Andrea MontanariNeurIPS 2020 · 217 citations
- Fundamental Tradeoffs between Invariance and Sensitivity to Adversarial PerturbationsFlorian Tramèr, Jens Behrmann, Nicholas Carlini, Nicolas Papernot et al.ICML 2020 · 103 citations
- GeoDA: A Geometric Framework for Black-Box Adversarial AttacksAli Rahmati, Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-Dezfooli, Pascal Frossard, Huaiyu DaiCVPR 2020
Related papers
- Shift Invariance Can Reduce Adversarial RobustnessVasu Singla, Songwei Ge, Ronen Basri, David W. JacobsNeurIPS 2021 · 29 citations
- High-Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural NetworksHaohan Wang, Xindi Wu, Zeyi Huang, Eric P. XingCVPR 2020
- Adversarial Examples Exist in Two-Layer ReLU Networks for Low Dimensional Linear SubspacesOdelia Melamed, Gilad Yehudai, Gal VardiNeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- What Can the Neural Tangent Kernel Tell Us About Adversarial Robustness?Nikolaos Tsilivis, Julia KempeNeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
- Robust Models Are More Interpretable Because Attributions Look NormalZifan Wang, Matt Fredrikson, Anupam DattaICML 2022 · 33 citations
