WATCH: Adaptive Monitoring for AI Deployments via Weighted-Conformal Martingales
Drew Prinster, Xing Han, Anqi Liu, Suchi Saria
Abstract
Responsibly deploying artificial intelligence (AI) / machine learning (ML) systems in high-stakes settings arguably requires not only proof of system reliability, but also continual, post-deployment monitoring to quickly detect and address any unsafe behavior. Methods for nonparametric sequential testing-especially conformal test martingales (CTMs) and anytime-valid inferenceoffer promising tools for this monitoring task. However, existing approaches are restricted to monitoring limited hypothesis classes or "alarm criteria" (e.g., detecting data shifts that violate certain exchangeability or IID assumptions), do not allow for online adaptation in response to shifts, and/or cannot diagnose the cause of degradation or alarm. In this paper, we address these limitations by proposing a weighted generalization of conformal test martingales (WCTMs), which lay a theoretical foundation for online monitoring for any unexpected changepoints in the data distribution while controlling false-alarms. For practical applications, we propose specific WCTM algorithms that adapt online to mild covariate shifts (in the marginal input distribution), quickly detect harmful shifts, and diagnose those harmful shifts as concept shifts (in the conditional label distribution) or extreme (out-of-support) covariate shifts that cannot be easily adapted to. On real-world datasets, we demonstrate improved performance relative to state-of-the-art baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f2a04f71-eea9-4a62-b4df-b0845f7e3a77Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Classification with Valid and Adaptive CoverageYaniv Romano, Matteo Sesia, Emmanuel J. CandèsNeurIPS 2020 · 586 citations
- Conformal prediction interval for dynamic time-seriesChen Xu, Yao XieICML 2021 · 174 citations
- Tracking the risk of a deployed model and detecting harmful distribution shiftsAleksandr Podkopaev, Aaditya RamdasICLR 2022 · 36 citations
- Sequential Predictive Two-Sample and Independence TestingAleksandr Podkopaev, Aaditya RamdasNeurIPS 2023 · 29 citations
- Derandomized novelty detection with FDR control via conformal e-valuesMeshi Bashari, Amir Epstein, Yaniv Romano, Matteo SesiaNeurIPS 2023 · 28 citations
Related papers
- Testing For Distribution Shifts with Conditional Conformal Test MartingalesShalev Shaer, Yarin Bar, Drew Prinster, Yaniv RomanoICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Conformal Validity Guarantees Exist for Any Data Distribution (and How to Find Them)Drew Prinster, Samuel Don Stanton, Anqi Liu, Suchi SariaICML 2024 · 20 citations
- Adaptive Conformal Inference Under Distribution ShiftIsaac Gibbs, Emmanuel J. CandèsNeurIPS 2021 · 665 citations
- Adaptive Conformal Anomaly Detection with Time Series Foundation Models for Signal Monitoring.Natalia Martinez, Fearghal O'Donncha, Wesley M. Gifford, Nianjun Zhou et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Sequential Harmful Shift Detection Without LabelsSalim I. Amoukou, Tom Bewley, Saumitra Mishra, Freddy Lécué et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
