Shaving Weights with Occam's Razor: Bayesian Sparsification for Neural Networks using the Marginal Likelihood
Rayen Dhahri, Alexander Immer, Bertrand Charpentier, Stephan Günnemann, Vincent Fortuin
Abstract
Neural network sparsification is a promising avenue to save computational time and memory costs, especially in an age where many successful AI models are becoming too large to naïvely deploy on consumer hardware. While much work has focused on different weight pruning criteria, the overall sparsifiability of the network, i.e., its capacity to be pruned without quality loss, has often been overlooked. We present Sparsifiability via the Marginal likelihood (SpaM), a pruning framework that highlights the effectiveness of using the Bayesian marginal likelihood in conjunction with sparsity-inducing priors for making neural networks more sparsifiable. Our approach implements an automatic Occam's razor that selects the most sparsifiable model that still explains the data well, both for structured and unstructured sparsification. In addition, we demonstrate that the pre-computed posterior Hessian approximation used in the Laplace approximation can be re-used to define a cheap pruning criterion, which outperforms many existing (more expensive) approaches. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, especially at high sparsity levels, across a range of different neural network architectures and datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f27cc4b9-32a6-4d68-a07a-4731c09b8342Cited by top-tier papers2
- Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal LikelihoodAlexander Timans, Thomas Moellenhoff, Christian Andersson Naesseth, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan et al.ICML 2026
- Neural Differentiation in Deep Networks: A Theoretical Framework for Expressivity and Representational DiversityBoyuan Wang, Richard JiangCVPR 2026
Builds on19
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman et al.ICML 2023 · 6,966 citations
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language ModelsMingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, J. Zico KolterICLR 2024 · 794 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
Related papers
- BMRS: Bayesian Model Reduction for Structured PruningDustin Wright, Christian Igel, Raghavendra SelvanNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Bayesian Model Selection, the Marginal Likelihood, and GeneralizationSanae Lotfi, Pavel Izmailov, Gregory W. Benton, Micah Goldblum et al.ICML 2022 · 83 citations
- Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep LearningAlexander Immer, Matthias Bauer, Vincent Fortuin, Gunnar Rätsch et al.ICML 2021 · 130 citations
- Provable Filter Pruning for Efficient Neural NetworksLucas Liebenwein, Cenk Baykal, Harry Lang, Dan Feldman et al.ICLR 2020 · 161 citations
- Efficient Variational Inference for Sparse Deep Learning with Theoretical GuaranteeJincheng Bai, Qifan Song, Guang ChengNeurIPS 2020 · 55 citations
