Explaining the role of Intrinsic Dimensionality in Adversarial Training
Enes Altinisik, Safa Messaoud, Husrev Taha Sencar, Hassan Sajjad, Sanjay Chawla
Abstract
Adversarial Training (AT) impacts different architectures in distinct ways: vision models gain robustness but face reduced generalization, encoderbased models exhibit limited robustness improvements with minimal generalization loss, and recent work in latent-space adversarial training (LAT) demonstrates that decoder-based models achieve improved robustness by applying AT across multiple layers. We provide the first explanation for these trends by leveraging the manifold conjecture: off-manifold adversarial examples (AEs) enhance robustness, while on-manifold AEs improve generalization. We show that vision and decoder-based models exhibit low intrinsic dimensionality in earlier layers (favoring offmanifold AEs), whereas encoder-based models do so in later layers (favoring on-manifold AEs). Exploiting this property, we introduce SMAAT, which improves the scalability of AT for encoderbased models by perturbing the layer with the lowest intrinsic dimensionality. This reduces the projected gradient descent (PGD) chain length required for AE generation, cutting GPU time by 25-33% while significantly boosting robustness. We validate SMAAT across multiple tasks, including text generation, sentiment classification, safety filtering, and retrieval augmented generation setups, demonstrating superior robustness with comparable generalization to standard training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentionHugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa et al.ICML 2021 · 8,974 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and EntailmentDi Jin, Zhijing Jin, Joey Tianyi Zhou, Peter SzolovitsAAAI 2020 · 1,333 citations
- MagNet: A Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial ExamplesDongyu Meng, Hao ChenCCS 2017 · 1,295 citations
Related papers
- Dual Manifold Adversarial Robustness: Defense against Lp and non-Lp Adversarial AttacksWei-An Lin, Chun Pong Lau, Alexander Levine, Rama Chellappa et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 70 citations
- Enhancing the Adversarial Robustness via Manifold ProjectionZhiting Li, Shibai Yin, Tai-Xiang Jiang, Yexun Hu et al.AAAI 2025 · 5 citations
- Semi-supervised Semantics-guided Adversarial Training for Robust Trajectory PredictionRuochen Jiao, Xiangguo Liu, Takami Sato, Qi Alfred Chen et al.ICCV 2023 · 26 citations
- Which Models have Perceptually-Aligned Gradients? An Explanation via Off-Manifold RobustnessSuraj Srinivas, Sebastian Bordt, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2023 · 24 citations
- Towards Compositional Adversarial Robustness: Generalizing Adversarial Training to Composite Semantic PerturbationsLei Hsiung, Yun-Yun Tsai, Pin-Yu Chen, Tsung-Yi HoCVPR 2023
