PITA: Prompting Task Interaction for Argumentation Mining
Yang Sun, Muyi Wang, Jianzhu Bao, Bin Liang, Xiaoyan Zhao, Caihua Yang, Min Yang, Ruifeng Xu
Abstract
Argumentation mining (AM) aims to detect the arguments and their inherent relations from argumentative textual compositions. Prior methods are afflicted by a sequential feature decoding paradigm, wherein they initially address the features of argumentation components (ACs) for argumentative relation type classification (ACTC) subtask. Then, these features are amalgamated in pairs for argumentative relation identification (ARI) subtask. Finally, the AC pairs and ascertained pertinent relations are employed for argumentative relation type classification (ARTC) subtask. However, these methods merely rely on a shared encoder to implicitly capture the interactions of the three subtasks, which cannot explicitly and comprehensively model the inter-relationship among subtasks. In this paper, we propose a novel method PITA for PromptIng Task interAction to model the inter-relationships among the three subtasks within a generative framework. Specifically, we employ a dynamic prompt template to indicate all ACs and AC pairs in the three subtasks. Then, we construct an undirected heterogeneous graph to capture the various relationships within and between ACs and AC pairs. We apply the Relational Graph Convolutional Network (RGCN) on the graph and inject the task interaction information into the soft prompts with continuous representations. PITA jointly decodes all ACs and AC pairs using the prompt template with task interaction information, which thus explicitly and comprehensively harmonizes the information propagation across the three subtasks. Extensive experiments show PITA achieves state-of-the-art performances on two AM benchmarks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f268ac55-b060-403c-9fdc-41ccb6172649Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Prompt for Extraction? PAIE: Prompting Argument Interaction for Event Argument ExtractionYubo Ma, Zehao Wang, Yixin Cao, Mukai Li et al.ACL 2022 · 182 citations
- Language Models of Code are Few-Shot Commonsense LearnersAman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon, Yiming Yang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 103 citations
- The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt TuningBrian Lester, Rami Al-Rfou, Noah ConstantEMNLP 2021 · 94 citations
- HPT: Hierarchy-aware Prompt Tuning for Hierarchical Text ClassificationZihan Wang, Peiyi Wang, Tianyu Liu, Binghuai Lin et al.EMNLP 2022 · 42 citations
Related papers
- A Neural Transition-based Model for Argumentation MiningJianzhu Bao, Chuang Fan, Jipeng Wu, Yixue Dang et al.ACL 2021
- Argument Pair Extraction with Mutual Guidance and Inter-sentence Relation GraphJianzhu Bao, Bin Liang, Jingyi Sun, Yice Zhang et al.EMNLP 2021 · 14 citations
- Pair-Based Joint Encoding with Relational Graph Convolutional Networks for Emotion-Cause Pair ExtractionJunlong Liu, Xichen Shang, Qianli MaEMNLP 2022 · 21 citations
- A Generative Model for End-to-End Argument Mining with Reconstructed Positional Encoding and Constrained Pointer MechanismJianzhu Bao, Yuhang He, Yang Sun, Bin Liang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 15 citations
- APE: Argument Pair Extraction from Peer Review and Rebuttal via Multi-task LearningLiying Cheng, Lidong Bing, Qian Yu, Wei Lu et al.EMNLP 2020 · 56 citations
